DARPA Swats Down Boeing's Dragonfly UAV | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.21.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.23.25

Airborne-FltTraining-04.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.25.25

Tue, Sep 12, 2006

DARPA Swats Down Boeing's Dragonfly UAV

Second Prototype Lost In April Accident

A lack of low-speed stability and control authority -- that manifested itself in the loss of two flying prototypes -- was enough to convince the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to axe Boeing's Dragonfly X-50A unmanned aerial vehicle project recently.

The decision marks the end of the $51.8 million program, with Boeing using the leftover funds to compile a report on just what went wrong with the UAV, according to media sources.

Utilizing a design called a Canard Rotor/Wing (CRW), the X-50A Dragonfly was designed for vertical takeoff using a main rotor similar to a helicopter -- but using vectored turbojet thrust to turn the blades, instead of a conventional mechanical linkage. The craft was to then transition to forward flight by stopping the wide rotor (which then served as a wing) and directing thrust over the aircraft's tail... with the process reversed for landing.

Alas, that kind of "conversion" flight was never fully achieved -- as both Dragonfly prototypes were lost in early flight testing. The first crash, in March 2004, led to a joint investigation by both parties. DARPA and Boeing later ruled cross-coupling of the rotor controls as the main cause of the mishap -- resulting in improvements to the second prototype.

As Aero-News reported, the second Dragonfly prototype flew for the first time in December 2005. It progressed as far as slow forward flight... but 18 minutes into a test flight on April 12, 2006, the prototype once again lost control during a transition attempt.

DARPA says the second prototype was lost due to poor low-speed control authority, as well as extreme sensitivity to wake strength off the vehicle's rotor.

The agency states the accident occurred after rotor wake hit the fuselage, and caused the Dragonfly's nose to pitch up violently -- and in excess of the abilities of the control system to recover.

FMI: www.darpa.mil, www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.28.25)

“While legendary World War II aircraft such as the Corsair and P-51 Mustang still were widely flown at the start of the Korean War in 1950, a new age of jets rapidly came to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.25): Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.24.25: GA Refocused, Seminole/Epic, WestJet v TFWP

Also: Cal Poly Aviation Club, $$un Country, Arkansas Aviation Academy, Teamsters Local 2118 In response to two recent general aviation accidents that made national headlines, more >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.29.25)

“The FAA is tasked with ensuring our skies are safe, and they do a great job at it, but there is something about the system that is holding up the medical process. Obviously,>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC