One Year Later, Dittemore Scarred By Columbia Loss | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.21.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.23.25

Airborne-FltTraining-04.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.25.25

Sun, Feb 01, 2004

One Year Later, Dittemore Scarred By Columbia Loss

Trying To Heal, Never To Forget

In the days following the Columbia disaster last February, former shuttle program manager Ron Dittemore was in front of the cameras, talking to reporters, briefing the world on recovery efforts and the investigation into what caused the shuttle to disintegrate as it re-entered the atmosphere one year ago on Sunday. Dittemore was perhaps the most senior NASA official to take the fall after that disaster. He now works in an aerospace job for a private company based in Utah.

Dittemore wonders why he didn't react more strongly when he saw a suitcase-sized chunk of insulating foam smack into Columbia's left wing about 80 seconds after lift-off on January 16th, 2003. "Why didn't the hair stand up on your neck?" he asks himself over and over again.

Dittemore was in front of the media hours after the tragedy. "There are a lot of things in this business that look like the smoking gun but turn out not even to be close,"

Four days later, when asked about that chunk of foam -- whether it could have played a part in the shuttle's demise -- he categorically denied it. Later, in interviews with investigators, he admitted he shouldn't have ruled out the possibility so quickly.

But the damage had been done. NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe was red-faced angry at the quick dismissal of the "foamologist" theory. O'Keefe was just as angry at those who, in the early days following Columbia's destruction, insisted the foam, which impacted the shuttle wing at more than 500 mph, was indeed to blame. In short, he was angry that anyone would jumped to conclusions without all the facts. Dittemore later resigned from NASA.

The facts are in. The Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) ruled last summer that the foam impact appeared to have punctured the wing, allowing the superheated gasses generated during re-entry to penetrate the orbiter's wing, leading to the shuttle's disintegration.

Dittemore is a man haunted by the past.

"It doesn't get any easier as the time passes, because I still focus on seven families, and what did we miss to allow such a tragedy to occur," he says.

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.28.25)

“While legendary World War II aircraft such as the Corsair and P-51 Mustang still were widely flown at the start of the Korean War in 1950, a new age of jets rapidly came to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.25): Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.24.25: GA Refocused, Seminole/Epic, WestJet v TFWP

Also: Cal Poly Aviation Club, $$un Country, Arkansas Aviation Academy, Teamsters Local 2118 In response to two recent general aviation accidents that made national headlines, more >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.29.25)

“The FAA is tasked with ensuring our skies are safe, and they do a great job at it, but there is something about the system that is holding up the medical process. Obviously,>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC