EAA Responds to Proposed Leaded AVGAS Ban | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.03.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.05.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Affordable Flying Expo Tickets (Discount Code: AFE2025): CLICK HERE!
LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall, 1800ET, 11.07.25: www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Feb 08, 2023

EAA Responds to Proposed Leaded AVGAS Ban

Washington State Ban, Too Much, Too Fast

The Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) has joined other general aviation associations in opposing a Washington-State House of Representatives bill that would ban the sale of leaded aviation gas in that loveliest of U.S. states held captive in perpetuity by left-leaning Seattle lawmakers. The bill—WA HB1554—would, as of 01 January 2024, begin a phased-in restriction on the “selling, distributing, or otherwise making available to consumers” leaded avgas in Washington State. Subject restrictions would initially be placed on those airports in the areas of greatest population with additional restrictions culminating in a complete ban for the entire state in 2030.

The letter—signed by EAA, the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), Helicopter Association International (HAI), and the National Air Transportation Association (NATA)—was sent prior to a 01 February 2023 committee hearing on the bill.

The aviation associations, by dint of the letter, reaffirmed the industry’s commitment to moving to a lead-free fuel. The groups pointed out, however, that a ban on leaded aviation fuel would occasion an immediate threat to Washington State pilots and aircraft owners that require leaded fuel—not to mention the entirety of the people, places, electric automobiles, coffee shops, hop farms, microbreweries, apple orchards, and marijuana dispensaries over which they fly. Moreover, the legislation would engender instant, likely insuperable economic hardship for small fuel-sellers on small airports throughout Washington State as pilots would summarily overfly the Evergreen State for purpose of purchasing fuel in neighboring Oregon, Idaho, or British Columbia.

“Progress is being made towards an unleaded future,” the letter states. “At the federal level, HAI, EAA, GAMA and NATA continue to co-lead the Eliminate Aviation Gasoline Lead Emissions (EAGLE) Initiative with the stated goal of removing lead by the end of 2030. EAGLE includes the FAA, industry, and other aviation advocacy organizations and is supported by Federal funding and industry in-kind support for the testing, evaluation, approval, and deployment of unleaded fuels.”

Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) northwest mountain regional manager Brad Schuster provided in-person and written statements opposing the bill. To edify the committee vis-a-vis aviation industry efforts to implement lead-free solutions, Schuster highlighted the safety and economic impacts the proposed restrictions are apt to have on the state’s aviation infrastructure.

The committee also heard statements set forth by parties opposed to the bill. The Washington Public Ports Association, which includes approximately 34 airports in various state port authority jurisdictions, as well as the Washington State Department of Transportation Interim State Aviation Directory also provided statements highlighting the safety and economic impacts the proposed restrictions would have were the bill to pass as drafted.

In opposing the legislation, the EAA and aviation industry associations contemporaneously supported the EAGLE initiative and encouraged airport operational practices that mitigate lead exposures whenever possible. The associations also welcomed a dialogue with the Washington legislative committee, and asked committee members to lend credence to EAGLE and consider the associations’ collective resources going forward.

EAA and the assemblage of industry associations will continue to monitor developments regarding WA HB1554 and urge EAA members and Washington State pilots to do likewise.

FMI: www.eaa.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.05.25: Tesla Flying Car?, Jepp/ForeFlight Sold, A220 Troubles

Also: AFE25 Tickets!, Jamaica Recovery, E-Aircraft at Boeing Fld, Diamond DA50 RG Cert Elon Musk is once again promising the impossible…this time, in the form of a Tesla tha>[...]

Airborne 11.07.25: Affordable Expo Starts!, Duffy Worries, Isaacman!

Also: Louisville UPS Crash Aftermath, Taiwan Boosts Pilot Pool, Spartan Acquires, DON’T MISS the MOSAIC Town Hall! This three-day Affordable Flying Expo brings together indoo>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.05.25)

“Our strategic partnership with AutoFlight, backed by their substantial technological expertise and tangible advancements in eVTOL airworthiness, represents a significant mil>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.05.25)

Aero Linx: British Gliding Association (BGA) The British Gliding Association is the governing body for the sport of gliding in the UK and members are the 76 clubs that provide glid>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22

While Descending Toward ASN, He Advanced The Throttle, But The Engine Did Not Respond On October 2, 2025, at 1126 central daylight time, a Cirrus SR22, N812SE, was substantially da>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC