U.S. Senate: JSF Is Essentially Three Different Airplanes | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 18, 2016

U.S. Senate: JSF Is Essentially Three Different Airplanes

Air Force Lt. General Says The Three Variants Are Only About 20-25 Percent 'Common'

From the outside, the three variants of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter look very similar. But they are very different airplanes with very different missions, according to the U.S. Senate, and the head of the JSF program.

In a draft of the Senate's National Defense Authorization Act of 2017, the Senate states: "Despite aspirations for a joint aircraft, the F-35A, F-35B and F-35C are essentially three distinct aircraft, with significantly different missions and capability requirements.”

National Interest online reports that earlier this year, U.S. Air Force lieutenant general Christopher Bogdan, head of the JSF program office, said during a recent seminar that the three variants of the F-35 have only about 20-25 percent of their components in common. Air Force Magazine reported that Brogen said it is "almost like three separate production lines." A true JSF is difficult, he said, because each branch insists on its unique requirements.

The language indicating that the aircraft are three airplanes may not make it all the way through the budget process. Similar language may not be included in the House version of the Defense Authorization Act, and therefore not make it into the reconciliation bill.

In its NDAA language, the Senate requires the JSF program office to close by 2019, when the plane should be in full-rate production. It would then be split into three different programs for the Air Force, Navy and Marines. “Devolving this program to the services will help ensure the proper alignment of responsibility and accountability the F-35 program needs and has too often lacked,” the Senate said.

(Images from file)

FMI: www.armed-services.senate.gov


Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra Aircraft Announces the Extra 330SX

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): An Even Faster Rolling Extra! Jim Campbell joined General Manager of Extra Aircraft Duncan Koerbel at AirVenture 2023 to talk about what’s up and>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.15.25)

“Receiving our Permit to Fly and starting Phase 4 marks a defining moment for Vertical Aerospace. Our team has spent months verifying every core system under close regulatory>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.15.25): Middle Marker

Middle Marker A marker beacon that defines a point along the glideslope of an ILS normally located at or near the point of decision height (ILS Category I). It is keyed to transmit>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Lancair 320

The Experienced Pilot Chose To Operate In Instrument Meteorological Conditions Without An Instrument Flight Rules Clearance Analysis: The airplane was operated on a personal cross->[...]

Airborne 11.14.25: Last DC-8 Retires, Boeing Recovery, Teeny Trig TXP

Also: ATI Strike Prep, Spirit Still Troubled, New CubCrafters Dealership, A-29 Super Tucano Samaritan’s Purse is officially moving its historic Douglas DC-8 cargo jet into re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC