Potential Cause Is Found For The Loss Of The SpaceX Falcon 9 Rocket | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-SpecialEpisode-12.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Jul 21, 2015

Potential Cause Is Found For The Loss Of The SpaceX Falcon 9 Rocket

SpaceX CEO, Elon Musk Is Speaking About The Possible Reason For The Failure Of The June 28 Launch Of The Falcon 9

To modify an old adage, growing old, and launching rockets into space, is not for sissies. Now, it appears that the failure of the Falcon 9 booster headed to resupply the International Space Station was caused by a structural problem when a strut failed in the rocket's upper stage liquid oxygen tank.

According to an Associated Press report, Elon Musk, said on Monday that these struts had flown many times before without any problem. But two minutes into the June 28 launch, one of the struts in the second stage of the unmanned Falcon 9 rocket likely broke loose.

The strut was described as holding down a high-pressure helium bottle in the liquid oxygen tank. The report said that if the strut failed, which they now believe was the case, the bottle would have rapidly moved to the top of the tank resulting in a failure that led to the explosion. Musk is reported to have said that when the strut snapped, the helium tanks released a lot of helium into the upper-stage liquid oxygen tank. That put too much pressure on the tank and caused it to explode.

According to Musk, the strut was designed to handle 10,000 pounds of force, but failed at just 2,000 pounds of force. During a press conference, musk is quoted as saying, "This is the best of what we know thus far. We emphasize this is an initial assessment, and further investigation may reveal more over time."

(Image from file)

FMI: www.spacex.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.18.25)

“These new aircraft strengthen our ability to respond quickly, train effectively and support communities nationwide. Textron Aviation has been a steadfast supporter in helpin>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Viking Twin Otter 400--Bringing the DHC-6 Back Into Production

From 2011 (YouTube Edition): Rugged, Legendary, STOL Twin Makes A Comeback The de Havilland Twin Otter is an airplane with a long history, and it gained a reputation as a workhorse>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Rans Employee Flying Club Rans S-6ES Coyote II

A Wind Gust Lifted The Right Wing And The Airplane Turned To The Left Analysis: The pilot was departing from a 2,395-ft-long by 50-ft-wide turf runway. The pilot reported that afte>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.18.25): Braking Action Advisories

Braking Action Advisories When tower controllers receive runway braking action reports which include the terms “medium," “poor," or “nil," or whenever weather con>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC