Lawsuits Against CA Balloonists Dropped | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sun, Sep 04, 2011

Lawsuits Against CA Balloonists Dropped

But Defending Against JCM Litigation Has Closed Some Down

Hot air balloonists in California have achieved what may be a hollow victory over JCM Farming, Inc. of Solana Beach. The corporation constructed a fortified compound and erected signs warning of guard dogs and armed response to trespassers on land zoned for agricultural use.

In an apparent effort to impose its own restrictions on the use of airspace above its facility, the company filed lawsuits against hot air balloon ride providers it said were flying too low over the facility, which it described in part as "intended to provide a secure meeting place and retreat for VIPs, dignitary and other notable individuals and/or the companies they represent." The FAA twice investigated complaints, and found the balloonists were operating within the regs. Finally, after more than two years, on August 15th, the suits were dropped.

But the Desert Sun reports it's too late for many of the defendants, whose businesses were essentially destroyed. One balloonist claims he spent $177,000 in attorney's fees. Even the FAA was added to the lawsuit by JCM, after it declared there were no violations of its rules.

Development Management Group of Palm Desert conducted a study which found that the overall economy of the Coachella Valley lost almost 95 percent of the balloon industry's $9.7 million annual contribution between its peak in the 2005-2006 season and this year, only about a third of which could be blamed on the recession.

It may be possible for the former defendants to sue JCM for damages caused to their businesses, but it's not clear any of the balloonists will open that door to more unknown legal costs.

FMI: www.mydesert.com/article/20110831/NEWS01/108310312/Balloon-case-reveals-expense-inequity-civil-lawsuits

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Douglas A-4K

Pilot Applied Full Aft Stick And Nose-Up Trim, But The Airplane Remained On The Runway Analysis: The pilot reported that a preflight inspection and flight control checks revealed n>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: PBY Catalina--From Wartime to Double Sunrise to the Long Sunset

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Before They’re All Gone... Humankind has been messing about in airplanes for almost 120-years. In that time, thousands of aircraft representing i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.01.25): Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) A transportation system that transports people and property by air between two points in the NAS using aircraft with advanced technologies, including el>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.01.25)

Aero Linx: MQ-1B Predator The MQ-1B Predator is an armed, multi-mission, medium-altitude, long-endurance remotely piloted aircraft that is employed primarily as an intelligence-col>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC