PAMA Supports FAA Efforts to Re-Test Mechanics | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, May 06, 2009

PAMA Supports FAA Efforts to Re-Test Mechanics

After reports of FAA investigation of A&P testing centers in Texas and the subsequent claims that as many as 1300 mechanics may have been "improperly" certified over the course of well over a decade, the Professional Aviation Maintenance Association is stepping up to face the matter head-on. The FAA reports that some of the mechanics have been retested, but, because the mechanics are now dispersed around the world, retesting progress has been slowed. PAMA has gone on the record as supporting and commending the FAA's attempts to correct this issue.

"PAMA strongly endorses the comprehensive, quality education as prescribed by the FAA for students entering the field, and we are dedicated to helping the FAA improve and modernize the system. We believe the work of an improperly trained and certified A&P mechanic not only reflects negatively upon all maintenance professionals but presents an inherent danger to the purpose of our industry - the safety of flight. We work closely with the FAA to ensure that PAMA continuing education programming meets industry needs and Administration standards. Also, to enhance an A&P candidate's education, PAMA extends its membership benefits to PART 147 students and encourages their involvement in PAMA chapter activities, as well as national events. To us, quality continuing education is just as important as the quality of initial A&P training."

PAMA adds that, "While we support and commend the FAA's attempts to correct the problem in Texas, we also encourage the Administration to recognize that the individuals going through these programs may not have understood they were not getting proper training. These individuals no doubt entered the industry placing their trust in a training institution to prepare them properly. We do not believe that these individuals should be working in the industry with their current training, but we do applaud the Administration for providing a mechanism for these unsuspecting individuals to come into compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations."

FMI: www.pama.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.30.25): Ground Stop (GS)

Ground Stop (GS) The GS is a process that requires aircraft that meet a specific criteria to remain on the ground. The criteria may be airport specific, airspace specific, or equip>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.30.25)

Aero Linx: Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) improves safety and public confidence in aviation, marine and rail transport thro>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.30.25)

“The Palo Alto stopover confirmed—yet again—that flight schools and aero-clubs are no longer just curious about electric training; they are ready to buy. In just >[...]

NTSB Final Report: ICON A5

Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Clearance From The Water While Flying At A Low Altitude Analysis: The flight of two airplanes was in cruise flight on a north heading about 50 ft >[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC