Lawmaker: Scan The Small Stuff | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Mon, Aug 11, 2003

Lawmaker: Scan The Small Stuff

MA Democrat Wants Packages Of A Pound Or More Scanned For Explosives

If Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) has his way, everything that weighs a pound or more will be scanned for explosive traces before it's allowed on an aircraft. Markey who's a member of the Select Committee on Homeland Security, says the failure to screen small packages is "an unacceptable security risk that must be immediately remedied."

Speaking to reporters at Boston's Logan Field, Markey said of small cargo, "It is unseen and unscreened. It is taken right off these trucks and it is loaded right on to passenger planes right under the feet of passengers who have just taken off their shoes to have them screened."

Markey points to the so-called shoe-bomber, Richard Reid, who carried less than ten ounces of explosives in his tennis shoes in December, 2001, when he boarded an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami (FL). That small amount of explosives, the government says, would have knocked Flight 63 out of the sky. Markey also pointed to the explosives that blew up Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, killing 170 people. That little package, he said, contained 11 ounces to a pound of Semtex plastic explosives.

Still, the smaller packages aren't screened. That decision has been based, in part, on research done by the US Postal Service. Transportation Security Administration spokesman Brian Turmail said small U.S. mail packages are not screened because federal studies have concluded that less than a pound of explosives in the cargo area "is not going to bring an aircraft down or threaten passengers."

There is a price tag attached to Markey's demands. The TSA said it would cost $500 million to buy the necessary scanners and train the necessary people to screen all small packages.

FMI: www.tsa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC