Lawmaker: Scan The Small Stuff | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Aug 11, 2003

Lawmaker: Scan The Small Stuff

MA Democrat Wants Packages Of A Pound Or More Scanned For Explosives

If Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) has his way, everything that weighs a pound or more will be scanned for explosive traces before it's allowed on an aircraft. Markey who's a member of the Select Committee on Homeland Security, says the failure to screen small packages is "an unacceptable security risk that must be immediately remedied."

Speaking to reporters at Boston's Logan Field, Markey said of small cargo, "It is unseen and unscreened. It is taken right off these trucks and it is loaded right on to passenger planes right under the feet of passengers who have just taken off their shoes to have them screened."

Markey points to the so-called shoe-bomber, Richard Reid, who carried less than ten ounces of explosives in his tennis shoes in December, 2001, when he boarded an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami (FL). That small amount of explosives, the government says, would have knocked Flight 63 out of the sky. Markey also pointed to the explosives that blew up Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, killing 170 people. That little package, he said, contained 11 ounces to a pound of Semtex plastic explosives.

Still, the smaller packages aren't screened. That decision has been based, in part, on research done by the US Postal Service. Transportation Security Administration spokesman Brian Turmail said small U.S. mail packages are not screened because federal studies have concluded that less than a pound of explosives in the cargo area "is not going to bring an aircraft down or threaten passengers."

There is a price tag attached to Markey's demands. The TSA said it would cost $500 million to buy the necessary scanners and train the necessary people to screen all small packages.

FMI: www.tsa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC