Lawmaker: Scan The Small Stuff | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.03.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.05.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Affordable Flying Expo Tickets (Discount Code: AFE2025): CLICK HERE!
LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall, 1800ET, 11.07.25: www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Aug 11, 2003

Lawmaker: Scan The Small Stuff

MA Democrat Wants Packages Of A Pound Or More Scanned For Explosives

If Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) has his way, everything that weighs a pound or more will be scanned for explosive traces before it's allowed on an aircraft. Markey who's a member of the Select Committee on Homeland Security, says the failure to screen small packages is "an unacceptable security risk that must be immediately remedied."

Speaking to reporters at Boston's Logan Field, Markey said of small cargo, "It is unseen and unscreened. It is taken right off these trucks and it is loaded right on to passenger planes right under the feet of passengers who have just taken off their shoes to have them screened."

Markey points to the so-called shoe-bomber, Richard Reid, who carried less than ten ounces of explosives in his tennis shoes in December, 2001, when he boarded an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami (FL). That small amount of explosives, the government says, would have knocked Flight 63 out of the sky. Markey also pointed to the explosives that blew up Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, killing 170 people. That little package, he said, contained 11 ounces to a pound of Semtex plastic explosives.

Still, the smaller packages aren't screened. That decision has been based, in part, on research done by the US Postal Service. Transportation Security Administration spokesman Brian Turmail said small U.S. mail packages are not screened because federal studies have concluded that less than a pound of explosives in the cargo area "is not going to bring an aircraft down or threaten passengers."

There is a price tag attached to Markey's demands. The TSA said it would cost $500 million to buy the necessary scanners and train the necessary people to screen all small packages.

FMI: www.tsa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.02.25)

"Aero-News has been working with SUN n FUN as their media partner for the better part of a decade and gotten to know their crew quite well... but this cooperative undertaking has p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.02.25): Inner-Approach OFZ

Inner-Approach OFZ The inner-approach OFZ is a defined volume of airspace centered on the approach area. The inner-approach OFZ applies only to runways with an approach lighting sy>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: MultiGP Drone Racing - Aviation’s New Action Sport

From 2017 (YouTube Edition): Pilots Competed For $10,000 For A First Place Finish… Drone Racing came to the Sebring Sport Aviation Expo in January, with pilots competing for>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.03.25): On-Course Indication

On-Course Indication An indication on an instrument, which provides the pilot a visual means of determining that the aircraft is located on the centerline of a given navigational t>[...]

Airborne 10.29.25: X-59 Flies!!!, Kings Aid CFIs, Shutdown Hurts ATC Training

Also: AIR Loses eVTOL Demonstrator, USCG Getting New Helos, Freighter Fleet To Grow, US Army Falls Behind Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, in partnership with NASA, successfully comple>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC