Experts: Impossible To Determine If Aberdeen Super Puma Accident Was Preventable | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Fri, Jan 31, 2014

Experts: Impossible To Determine If Aberdeen Super Puma Accident Was Preventable

Gearbox Pieces Critical To Investigation Never Recovered From The Ocean Floor

It may be impossible to determine if an accident in 2009 that resulted in 16 fatalities in the North Sea was preventable, according to an inquiry being conducted in Aberdeen, Scotland.

The accident occurred when the main rotor gearbox on a Super Puma aircraft reportedly failed during flight and the aircraft went down in the water. But divers were unable to recover a critical piece, a gear that may have failed, from the ocean floor.

The Evening Express newspaper reports that the accident inquiry board was told that without that critical part, it is likely impossible to know if the accident was preventable. AAIB inspector Mark Jarvis said that because "we fully don't understand the failure mode," he could not say with certainty that the accident was avoidable.

But after inspecting what was recovered from the seabed, Jarvis said “What we do know is that if the gearbox had been removed from service and sent to the manufacturer then during their overhaul procedure this gearbox would have been rejected.”

He said there was evidence of spalling, or metal-on-metal contact, in the recovered gearbox, but there was not the usual amount of debris that would normally be found in such a situation.

An attorney for Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter) which made the Super Puma said that it was unlikely that the gear failed, because if it had been defective, that would have shown up in previous inspections. But Jarvis said that, as unlikely as that may be, "the possibility remains it … may have contributed to this accident.”

FMI: www.aaib.gov.uk

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Douglas A-4K

Pilot Applied Full Aft Stick And Nose-Up Trim, But The Airplane Remained On The Runway Analysis: The pilot reported that a preflight inspection and flight control checks revealed n>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: PBY Catalina--From Wartime to Double Sunrise to the Long Sunset

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Before They’re All Gone... Humankind has been messing about in airplanes for almost 120-years. In that time, thousands of aircraft representing i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.01.25): Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) A transportation system that transports people and property by air between two points in the NAS using aircraft with advanced technologies, including el>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.01.25)

Aero Linx: MQ-1B Predator The MQ-1B Predator is an armed, multi-mission, medium-altitude, long-endurance remotely piloted aircraft that is employed primarily as an intelligence-col>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC