GoPro Karma Recall Raises Regulatory Questions | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Wed, Dec 07, 2016

GoPro Karma Recall Raises Regulatory Questions

No Clear Indication As To What Agency Is Responsible For Protecting Consumers From Malfunctioning Drones

The recent recall by GoPro of its Karma drone has raised questions about what agency, if any, is responsible for protecting the public from such malfunctions.

A story published in Consumer Reports indicates that it is not clear what government agency has jurisdiction for enforcing such a recall. Scott Wolfson, a spokesman for the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) said that "we do not have jurisdiction over drones." And while the FAA regulates how and where drones can be operated, agency spokeswoman Alison Duquette told the publication that the FAA does not certify drones during the manufacturing process. "If a drone manufacturing defect that affects aviation safety were identified, the FAA would first contact the manufacturer to understand the issue and determine the best course of action to address the safety issue," she said.

GoPro spokesman Jeff Brown said that the company contacted both the CPSC and the FAA when they were planning the recall. The CPSC said there was a statutory carve out for aviation, but it would participate if GoPro wished. GoPro declined the offer. The FAA said it supported the company's decision to go ahead with the recall if it thought that was the best course of action, but it would not participate in the recall.

In June, Consumer's Union, which publishes Consumer Reports, identified drones as an "emerging hazard" and urged the CPSC to "not hesitate to get involved even when another agency is [overseeing] a product."

(Image from file)

FMI: http://consumersunion.org

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.24)

"Fly-by-wire flight, coupled with additional capability that are being integrated into ALFA, provide a great foundation for Bell to expand on its autonomous capabilities. This airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.24)

Aero Linx: B-21 Raider The B-21 Raider will be a dual-capable penetrating strike stealth bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. The B-21 will form th>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC