GoPro Karma Recall Raises Regulatory Questions | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Dec 07, 2016

GoPro Karma Recall Raises Regulatory Questions

No Clear Indication As To What Agency Is Responsible For Protecting Consumers From Malfunctioning Drones

The recent recall by GoPro of its Karma drone has raised questions about what agency, if any, is responsible for protecting the public from such malfunctions.

A story published in Consumer Reports indicates that it is not clear what government agency has jurisdiction for enforcing such a recall. Scott Wolfson, a spokesman for the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) said that "we do not have jurisdiction over drones." And while the FAA regulates how and where drones can be operated, agency spokeswoman Alison Duquette told the publication that the FAA does not certify drones during the manufacturing process. "If a drone manufacturing defect that affects aviation safety were identified, the FAA would first contact the manufacturer to understand the issue and determine the best course of action to address the safety issue," she said.

GoPro spokesman Jeff Brown said that the company contacted both the CPSC and the FAA when they were planning the recall. The CPSC said there was a statutory carve out for aviation, but it would participate if GoPro wished. GoPro declined the offer. The FAA said it supported the company's decision to go ahead with the recall if it thought that was the best course of action, but it would not participate in the recall.

In June, Consumer's Union, which publishes Consumer Reports, identified drones as an "emerging hazard" and urged the CPSC to "not hesitate to get involved even when another agency is [overseeing] a product."

(Image from file)

FMI: http://consumersunion.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC