Some TFRs Won't Become NSAs In 2005 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.03.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.04.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.05.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Mon, Dec 27, 2004

Some TFRs Won't Become NSAs In 2005

TFRs Downgraded After AOPA Intervention

Pilots in Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon, and Washington State's Puget Sound area got an early holiday present last week. Six temporary flight restriction (TFR) areas have become much less restrictive national security areas (NSAs). That nearly completes a process AOPA initiated earlier this year to reduce the number of restricted areas nationwide.

The military had wanted to turn 13 TFRs into prohibited areas. AOPA opposed that and suggested that airspace over military installations be designated national security areas. For 11 of the 13 TFRs, the FAA agreed.

TFRs in Washington (Bremerton, Everett, and Port Townsend), Indiana (Newport), Kentucky (Richmond), and Oregon (Umatilla) became NSAs today with the publication of the latest sectional chart. The Pueblo, Colorado, TFR will change over to an NSA with the next charting cycle effective January 20, 2005.

NSAs are marked on aeronautical charts with a broken magenta line and an advisory message to pilots to avoid the area (see "What's an NSA?"). If needed during times of heightened security, the FAA can issue a NOTAM restricting flight in an NSA.

"Since the 13 TFRs were thrown up shortly after September 11, 2001, AOPA has consistently advocated that they be eliminated as unnecessary and an operational hindrance to legitimate general aviation activities," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "Both AOPA staff and I have had countless meetings with the Defense Department, Department of Homeland Security, FAA, and members of Congress to quantify the impacts of these TFRs on pilots and to develop reasonable alternatives.

"An NSA, where pilots are requested to avoid flying too closely to sensitive areas, is a reasonable solution," said Boyer.

The FAA is currently in the rulemaking process to convert the TFRs over Bangor, Washington, and St. Marys, Georgia, into prohibited areas. AOPA is opposing both.

FMI: www.aopa.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.05.24: Yakstars Midair, Electra eSTOL Test, Space Tour No-Go

Also: Aerox 'Cylinder Sentinel', Annual TBM Reunion, Hubble Pause, Utah AAM A combined Spanish-Portuguese aerobatic demo team suffered a fatality at the Beja AirShow, when one of t>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Aviation Prop Masters--Hartzell Composite Props for the KingAir

From 2019 (YouTube Version): Hartzell Propeller Secures STC For King Air Propellers Hartzell Propeller has secured an FAA Type Certificate for a new five-blade carbon fiber propell>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.03.24)

"Starship’s third flight test made tremendous strides towards a future of rapidly reliable reusable rockets. The test completed several exciting firsts, including the first S>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.03.24)

Aero Linx: Utah Back Country Pilots Association (UBCP) We hope to promote flying in Utah, and we welcome you to our state. We recognize the inherent hazards and risk involved in ba>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.03.24):Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC