Aussie's Altitude Violation Blamed On Fatigue | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 18, 2005

Aussie's Altitude Violation Blamed On Fatigue

Faulty Air Conditioning System Cited As Contributing Factor

A Qantas 737 flew far below minimum altitude on a flight from Perth to Canberra last year in part because of co-pilot fatigue, according to the ATSB -- and the aircraft's air conditioning system was also a factor.

The situation could have been much worse, according to investigators.

It happened July 24th, when the flight crew, holding for the approach south of Canberra, was alerted to the altitude problem by an enhanced proximity warning device just installed on the aircraft. The ATSB said the flight was at 5,850 feet when the minimum safe altitude was 7,400.

Investigators stressed the flight was never in peril and that the crew was already reacting to the situation when the alarm sounded.

"The aircraft was fitted with an enhanced ground proximity warning system, which detected the aircraft's proximity to the terrain and provided the crew with a caution terrain message to which the crew responded by climbing the aircraft to 6,500 feet," the report said. It was quoted by the Australian AP.

The report found that the copilot, who suffered from fatigue at the time, had entered the wrong data into the aircraft's flight management system. The problem was compounded by the fact that short-staffed controllers weren't monitoring radars at Canberra.

The ATSB report cited all those factors as contributing to the incident -- stressing that it wasn't serious, but could have been.

"It was an incident because there were a number of issues involved, but it was not classified as a serious incident," said ATSB Deputy Director Alan Stay.

As a result of the incident, Stray said Qantas had modified its hold procedures south of Canberra, requiring aircraft to fly at higher altitudes. The chart manufacturer involved also pledged to more clearly publish holding limits to reduce the chance of misinterpretation.

FMI: www.atsb.gov.au

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra Aircraft Announces the Extra 330SX

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): An Even Faster Rolling Extra! Jim Campbell joined General Manager of Extra Aircraft Duncan Koerbel at AirVenture 2023 to talk about what’s up and>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.15.25)

“Receiving our Permit to Fly and starting Phase 4 marks a defining moment for Vertical Aerospace. Our team has spent months verifying every core system under close regulatory>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.15.25): Middle Marker

Middle Marker A marker beacon that defines a point along the glideslope of an ILS normally located at or near the point of decision height (ILS Category I). It is keyed to transmit>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Lancair 320

The Experienced Pilot Chose To Operate In Instrument Meteorological Conditions Without An Instrument Flight Rules Clearance Analysis: The airplane was operated on a personal cross->[...]

Airborne 11.14.25: Last DC-8 Retires, Boeing Recovery, Teeny Trig TXP

Also: ATI Strike Prep, Spirit Still Troubled, New CubCrafters Dealership, A-29 Super Tucano Samaritan’s Purse is officially moving its historic Douglas DC-8 cargo jet into re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC