Are Pilots' Fuel Claims Hurting Opinion Of US Airlines? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Tue, Aug 26, 2008

Are Pilots' Fuel Claims Hurting Opinion Of US Airlines?

Now's Not A Good Time To Raise Specter Of Safety Concerns...

US airlines are already seeing passenger traffic decline as fares and fees rise, and many will effect capacity cuts next week. The last thing the airlines need right now, especially in a week filled with accident reports, is for pilots to suggest airline policy is creating a risk that airliners will run out of fuel in the air.

But the unions are all about looking for leverage... and pilot unions at American and US Airways are accusing management of bullying pilots into flying with uncomfortably low fuel levels.

Terry Trippler, of Tripplertravel.com, calls it a hot-button issue which could make travelers switch brands, or simply decide not to fly at all. "You don't want to mess around with it," he tells Reuters. It creates a bad public relations image."

As ANN reported, the US Airline Pilots Association at US Airways has complained pilots have been selected for mandatory training based on their decisions to add extra fuel to some flights. The increased weight makes planes more expensive to fly.

The union says that the training is actually a disciplinary action. The Allied Pilots Association, which represents pilots at American, has voiced a similar complaint.

David Castelveter, spokesman for the Air Transport Association, denies its a safety issue. "This more union politics than anything else. All the airlines are doing is asking the crews to be vigilant."

The FAA says there has been no new trend in emergency landings to suggest fuel levels are an issue.

So, is this just an attempt by the unions to make things uncomfortable for their employers? Trippler notes, "pilots obviously believe it would have an impact on bookings or they wouldn't be making it public."

FMI: www.airlines.org, www.usairways.com, www.aa.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.24)

"Fly-by-wire flight, coupled with additional capability that are being integrated into ALFA, provide a great foundation for Bell to expand on its autonomous capabilities. This airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.24)

Aero Linx: B-21 Raider The B-21 Raider will be a dual-capable penetrating strike stealth bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. The B-21 will form th>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC