Columbus (OH) Tower Design Requires More Eyes | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-SpecialEpisode-12.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Sep 30, 2003

Columbus (OH) Tower Design Requires More Eyes

Now, It Just Looks Like Another 'Jobs' Program

Now that it's built, and equipment is moving in, what might be a "hole" in design simulation software is starting to show up, at the new Port Columbus (OH) International Airport tower.

The tower, 224 feet tall, was supposed -- everyone assumed -- to have given unobstructed views of all the movement areas at the airport. As long as they didn't put the equipment in there, it probably would have, too -- but with the screens and things in place, some of the controllers have told the press that it's going to take more people up there, to see what needs to be seen. Besides, the tower, they now know, can't face two directions at once. After all, it has just 16 sides.

The FAA now plans to use double crews in the tower, to make sure everything that needs to be seen, will be seen.

Controllers had suggested raising the floor; the FAA noted that, if that were done, they couldn't see enough of the sky.

The tower, located between the two main runways, will need 25% more union controllers than the present design, raising the total complement from 48 to 60. [That's what the government calls, 'doubling' --ed.]

The tower, slated to become operational in April, was hosting tours, when one of the alert controllers noticed he couldn't see part of the north runway. Sure enough, when he repositioned himself to see that area, he couldn't see other things. Thus began some lively discussions.

The contractor said that seeing all movement areas wasn't part of the specification. Sure enough. Oops...

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.19.25): Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF)

Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF) The frequency band between 300 and 3,000 MHz. The bank of radio frequencies used for military air/ground voice communications. In some instances this may >[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22T

During The 7 Second Descent, There Was Another TAWS Alert At Which Time The Engine Remained At Full Power On October 24, 2025 at 2115 mountain daylight time, a Cirrus SR22T, N740TS>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Red Tail Project--Carrying the Torch of the Tuskegee Airmen

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Educational Organization Aims to Inspire by Sharing Tuskegee Story Founding leader Don Hinz summarized the Red Tail Project’s mission in simple, >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.19.25)

“This feels like an important step since space travel for people with disabilities is still in its very early days... I’m so thankful and hope it inspires a change in m>[...]

Airborne 12.17.25: Skydiver Hooks Tail, Cooper Rotax Mount, NTSB v NDAA

Also: New Katanas, Kern County FD Training, IndiGo’s Botched Roster, MGen. Leavitt Named ERAU Dean The Australian Transportation Safety Bureau (ATSB) has wrapped up its inves>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC