Latest JSF Engine Problem ... It's Too Big For Navy Transports | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.28.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.29.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.30.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Wed, Dec 01, 2010

Latest JSF Engine Problem ... It's Too Big For Navy Transports

F135 Engine Will Not Fit Through Standard COD Cargo Door Or On V-22 Osprey

The Navy is facing a significant challenge with the F135 engine developed by Pratt & Whitney for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter ... they can't get spare engines to an aircraft carrier by air or sea.


File Photo

The Navy Times reports that, even when it is broken down into its five components, the power module and packaging on the F135 engine will not fit through the cargo door of a standard Carrier Onboard Delivery (COD) aircraft, or aboard a V-22 Osprey. It can be transported externally by the V-22 some 288 miles "in good weather," the Navy says.

The issue could come during a combat operation when replacement engines might need to be transported to carriers quickly. The primary issue with external carriage by the V-22 is in that rotor wash and heat generated by the engines could be dangerous to deck crew attempting to attach slings to the engine crates while the aircraft hovers over the deck. Add to that the fact that the Navy has no V-22's ... they all belong to the Marines ... and has no plans to order any.


F-35C File Photo

The Navy says the engine module and transport container weighs 9,400 pounds, which makes them too heavy to transfer to and from a supply ship while underway. The newer Gerald R. Ford-class carriers would be able to handle the load, but only one is expected to be operational when the first F-35 squadrons deploy between 2015 and 2018.

Still, the issue with the F135 engine won't bolster the fortunes of the alternate F136 engine also under development. A Navy spokeswoman said the alternate engine would have similar transportability issues.

FMI: www.navy.mil

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.28.25)

“While legendary World War II aircraft such as the Corsair and P-51 Mustang still were widely flown at the start of the Korean War in 1950, a new age of jets rapidly came to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.25): Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.24.25: GA Refocused, Seminole/Epic, WestJet v TFWP

Also: Cal Poly Aviation Club, $$un Country, Arkansas Aviation Academy, Teamsters Local 2118 In response to two recent general aviation accidents that made national headlines, more >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.29.25)

“The FAA is tasked with ensuring our skies are safe, and they do a great job at it, but there is something about the system that is holding up the medical process. Obviously,>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC