Latest JSF Engine Problem ... It's Too Big For Navy Transports | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Dec 01, 2010

Latest JSF Engine Problem ... It's Too Big For Navy Transports

F135 Engine Will Not Fit Through Standard COD Cargo Door Or On V-22 Osprey

The Navy is facing a significant challenge with the F135 engine developed by Pratt & Whitney for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter ... they can't get spare engines to an aircraft carrier by air or sea.


File Photo

The Navy Times reports that, even when it is broken down into its five components, the power module and packaging on the F135 engine will not fit through the cargo door of a standard Carrier Onboard Delivery (COD) aircraft, or aboard a V-22 Osprey. It can be transported externally by the V-22 some 288 miles "in good weather," the Navy says.

The issue could come during a combat operation when replacement engines might need to be transported to carriers quickly. The primary issue with external carriage by the V-22 is in that rotor wash and heat generated by the engines could be dangerous to deck crew attempting to attach slings to the engine crates while the aircraft hovers over the deck. Add to that the fact that the Navy has no V-22's ... they all belong to the Marines ... and has no plans to order any.


F-35C File Photo

The Navy says the engine module and transport container weighs 9,400 pounds, which makes them too heavy to transfer to and from a supply ship while underway. The newer Gerald R. Ford-class carriers would be able to handle the load, but only one is expected to be operational when the first F-35 squadrons deploy between 2015 and 2018.

Still, the issue with the F135 engine won't bolster the fortunes of the alternate F136 engine also under development. A Navy spokeswoman said the alternate engine would have similar transportability issues.

FMI: www.navy.mil

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.03.25)

Aero Linx: American Aviation Historical Society AAHS is dedicated to the preservation and dissemination of the rich heritage of American aviation. Our purpose is to collect, preser>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.03.25): CrewMember (UAS)

CrewMember (UAS) A person assigned to perform an operational duty. A UAS crewmember includes the remote pilot in command, the person manipulating the controls, and visual observers>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Maule M-7-235A

Immediately After The Right Main Tire Contacted The Runway Surface, The Right Main Landing Gear Failed On October 31, 2025, at about 1227 Pacific daylight time, a Maule M-7-235A, N>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.04.25)

"On December 3, 2025, at approximately 10:45 a.m., a Thunderbird pilot ejected safely from a F-16C Fighting Falcon aircraft during a training mission over controlled airspace in Ca>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC