Americans Want New Set Of Goals Before Shuttles Return To Space | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Mon, Jul 21, 2003

Americans Want New Set Of Goals Before Shuttles Return To Space

Poll Shows Support For Manned Spaceflight, But Need For Redefinition

In the wake of the Columbia tragedy, Americans remain firmly behind NASA and manned space flight. But a new poll commissioned by the Houston Chronicle shows people don't want to return to space without a new set of goals -- reasons for being there.

More than two-thirds of the 800 people questioned by Zogby International said NASA is doing an excellent or good job of directing the nation's space program. An overwhelming majority, 83 percent, said they thought it was important to the country's international prestige to have humans flying in space.

Keep 'Em Flying

That could be cause for a big sigh of relief at both the Kennedy and Johnson space centers. "Support for a manned space program has always been strong, and no president has been willing to cancel it," said Roger Launius, a historian with the National Air and Space Museum and former senior NASA historian. "It is a consensus that lasts in this nation. This poll confirms that, and no elected officials are going to challenge that."

The poll shows, while Americans are bullish on continued shuttle flights, they're a little less certain whether the remaining space planes have aged to the point where they're just too dangerous. Simply put, the poll shows, most Americans want the whole nature of the shuttle program rethought and redefined.

Fifty-four percent of those polled said the CAIB shouldn't focus only on the cause of the Columbia disaster. Instead, the majority asked believes NASA should take a broader look at the direction the space program is going. Forty-three percent said the board should focus narrowly on the cause of the accident, fix the problems and get back to flying as quickly as possible.

Where From Here?

Forty percent of those asked said building a new orbiter to replace the aging space shuttles should be NASA's top priority. Thirty percent said the space agency's top task should be finishing the international space station. Another 10 percent said NASA has to establish a base on the moon. Finally, 9 percent said going to Mars should be the priority.

FMI: www.caib.us, www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC