Eminent Domain Backfires On Indiana County | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-03.10.25

Airborne-NextGen-03.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-03.12.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-03.13.25

Airborne-Unlimited-03.14.25

Tune in to www.airborne-live.net to watch our exclusive coverage of AEA 2025!
March 18 - Opening Session & New Product Introductions from 0830--1200 PDT
March 19 - First Day of LIVE interviews from the show floor: 1400--1630 PDT, 
March 20 - Day 2 of LIVE Interviews from the show floor: 1100--1400 PDT

Tue, Jan 17, 2012

Eminent Domain Backfires On Indiana County

Landowner Wins Settlement After Claiming Undervaluation

Eminent Domain laws allow government agencies to condemn private land for projects which benefit the public, but as one Indiana county has learned the hard way, taking more than is needed, or fudging on the fair value of that land, can get expensive. An attorney for a woman whose land was taken for a runway expansion says he'll file for a judgment to collect $865,000 in compensation won by the landowner in court.

Attorney John W. Mead tells the Jeffersonville News and Tribune that the proposed extension of the runway 18/36 at Clark County Regional Airport to 7,000 feet required the taking of only a portion of Margaret Dreyer's 72 acres, but the Clark County Board of Aviation Commissioners took the whole thing. The county says it acted to avoid leaving the landowner with only a swampy, unmarketable remnant of the plot, and that the FAA also advised taking the whole parcel.

A bigger issue was a wide disparity between the county's appraisal of what it called "farmland," and what the owner's appraiser called "light industrial." The Eminent Domain law requires considering use the “highest and best use” of the property in determining its value. The News and Tribune reports the difference between the two appraisals was almost $890,000. The jury decided on a number in the middle, $865,000, and the county has already paid $200,000 of that. It now much find the rest, plus $24,035 in attorney fees, and will have to pay interest of up to $194 per day until the case is settled.

The county reportedly finished last year with a surplus of $1.78 million.

FMI: www.clarkregionalairport.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (03.16.25): Flight Information Service-Broadcast (FIS-B)

Flight Information Service-Broadcast (FIS-B) A ground broadcast service provided through the ADS-B Broadcast Services network over the UAT data link that operates on 978 MHz. The F>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Vision Products LLC Introduces PilotVision Monocular HUD

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): The Well-Appointed Eye in the Sky Established in 2009 as the Vision Products Division of SA Photonics Inc. and spun-off as an independent business enti>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (03.16.25)

“Enstrom owners will be in very capable hands with Heli-Lynx. The company boasts nearly 23 years of helicopter completions, maintenance, STC development, R&O, and some of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (03.17.25)

“I'm incredibly proud of our Team Members for their continued dedication to our Guests and each other throughout this process. Despite the challenges we've faced as an organi>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 03.13.25: Risen Update, Titan's New Home, KISM Revolt

Also: Chute Failure, Skydiver Manual, AirVenture 2025 Update, 2025 SnF Innovation Preview Is On The Way! As previously reported, a Risen Superveloce (SV) flying from Alzate Brianza>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC