Van Nuys Puts Off Landing Fee Proposal | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sat, Jun 21, 2025

Van Nuys Puts Off Landing Fee Proposal

Airport Commissioners Review Fee Structure and Financial Transparency

In a move that surely disappointed no part of general aviation, the Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Board of Airport Commissioners voted on June 5 to postpone a decision on proposed landing fees at Van Nuys Airport (VNY). The proposed fee, $9.65 per 1,000 pounds, would have ranked among the highest in the country for general aviation.

The delay trails organized pushback from a coalition of aviation advocates, including the California Pilots Association, the National Business Aviation Association, NATA, the Van Nuys Airport Association and others. Their concerns ranged from a lack of financial transparency and unclear methodology to potential FAA compliance issues… the usual red flags when a new fee gets fast-tracked.

Van Nuys, located in the San Fernando Valley, is one of the busiest general aviation airports in the US, with over 330,000 operations in 2024. It's also home to more than 200 aviation businesses. Currently, VNY charges only a fuel flowage fee and relies on subsidies from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to cover airfield costs.

“To maintain a safe and efficient operating environment and ensure that the airport is as self-sustaining as possible, LAWA proposes to establish a landing fee at VNY,” the initial proposal read. “The landing fee will be based on airfield operating and capital costs and the total aircraft landing weight. This is a common industry methodology that is consistent with FAA policy.”

The proposed landing fee would apply to visiting aircraft but would exempt military, government, medical, and home-based aircraft that do not operate Part 135 flights. While LAWA cited new administrative tools as the reason it can now implement a landing fee, critics noted the rollout lacked the kind of detailed budgeting and justification that typically makes such proposals easier to digest.

Eve Lopez, CalPilots Vice President for the LA Region, said that the decision to delay shows “a willingness to return to the table with pilots, operators, and community stakeholders, a critical step toward a fair and data-driven process.”

FMI: www.iflyvny.com

Advertisement

More News

TikToker Arrested After Landing His C182 in Antarctica

19-Year-Old Pilot Was Attempting to Fly Solo to All Seven Continents On his journey to become the first pilot to land solo on all seven continents, 19-year-old Ethan Guo has hit a >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Versatile AND Practical - The All-Seeing Aeroprakt A-22 LSA

From 2017 (YouTube Edition): A Quality LSA For Well Under $100k… Aeroprakt unveiled its new LSA at the Deland Sport Aviation Showcase in November. Dennis Long, U.S. Importer>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.27.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.27.25)

Aero Linx: Historic Aircraft Association (HAA) The Historic Aircraft Association (HAA) was founded in 1979 with the aim of furthering the safe flying of historic aircraft in the UK>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.27.25)

"We would like to remember Liam not just for the way he left this world, but for how he lived in it... Liam was fearless, not necessarily because he wasn't afraid but because he re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC