Van Nuys Puts Off Landing Fee Proposal | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sat, Jun 21, 2025

Van Nuys Puts Off Landing Fee Proposal

Airport Commissioners Review Fee Structure and Financial Transparency

In a move that surely disappointed no part of general aviation, the Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Board of Airport Commissioners voted on June 5 to postpone a decision on proposed landing fees at Van Nuys Airport (VNY). The proposed fee, $9.65 per 1,000 pounds, would have ranked among the highest in the country for general aviation.

The delay trails organized pushback from a coalition of aviation advocates, including the California Pilots Association, the National Business Aviation Association, NATA, the Van Nuys Airport Association and others. Their concerns ranged from a lack of financial transparency and unclear methodology to potential FAA compliance issues… the usual red flags when a new fee gets fast-tracked.

Van Nuys, located in the San Fernando Valley, is one of the busiest general aviation airports in the US, with over 330,000 operations in 2024. It's also home to more than 200 aviation businesses. Currently, VNY charges only a fuel flowage fee and relies on subsidies from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to cover airfield costs.

“To maintain a safe and efficient operating environment and ensure that the airport is as self-sustaining as possible, LAWA proposes to establish a landing fee at VNY,” the initial proposal read. “The landing fee will be based on airfield operating and capital costs and the total aircraft landing weight. This is a common industry methodology that is consistent with FAA policy.”

The proposed landing fee would apply to visiting aircraft but would exempt military, government, medical, and home-based aircraft that do not operate Part 135 flights. While LAWA cited new administrative tools as the reason it can now implement a landing fee, critics noted the rollout lacked the kind of detailed budgeting and justification that typically makes such proposals easier to digest.

Eve Lopez, CalPilots Vice President for the LA Region, said that the decision to delay shows “a willingness to return to the table with pilots, operators, and community stakeholders, a critical step toward a fair and data-driven process.”

FMI: www.iflyvny.com

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Rutan Long-EZ

He Attempted To Restart The Engine Three Times. On The Third Restart Attempt, He Noticed That Flames Were Coming Out From The Right Wing Near The Fuel Cap Analysis: The pilot repor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ICAS Perspectives - Advice for New Air Show Performers

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Leading Air Show Performers Give Their Best Advice for Newcomers On December 6th through December 9th, the Paris Las Vegas Hotel hosted over 1,500 air >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.28.25)

Aero Linx: NASA ASRS ASRS captures confidential reports, analyzes the resulting aviation safety data, and disseminates vital information to the aviation community. The ASRS is an i>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.28.25)

“For our inaugural Pylon Racing Seminar in Roswell, we were thrilled to certify 60 pilots across our six closed-course pylon race classes. Not only did this year’s PRS >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC