FAA Rejects Proposal to Ease International Jumper Regs | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Nov 11, 2024

FAA Rejects Proposal to Ease International Jumper Regs

Agency Cites Limited Resources and a Lack of Safety Concern

The FAA recently and inexplicably rejected a request from the Parachute Industry Association (PIA) Rigging Committee aimed at changing the rules for foreign skydivers visiting the United States with their own gear. This would have simplified the unnecessarily strict regulations for repacking chutes.

The petition targeted 14 CFR 105.49, which allows foreign parachutists to jump under their home country’s regulations. However, this is limited in the FAA’s description of a foreign parachutist: “a parachutist who is neither a U.S. citizen or a resident alien and is participating in parachute operations within the United States using parachute equipment not manufactured in the United States.”

This definition means that, to comply with FAA regulations, international jumpers must have gear approved under FAA technical standard order C-23 (TSO’d) repacked by an FAA-certified rigger before using it in US borders.

The effort to revise the rule began in March 2023 at the PIA Symposium. Initially, they aimed for an exemption for Canadian jumpers crossing the US border, with the long-term goal of extending this exemption to other countries. In response, the FAA suggested the submission of a formal petition for rule changes to 14 CFR 105.49, which governs foreign parachutists' use of equipment in the U.S.

Despite this initial suggestion, the FAA sent a letter stating that it would not move forward with the request. The agency cited resource limitations, other higher-priority concerns, and a lack of safety issues with the current rule as reasons for the decision.

In response to the FAA’s decision, the PIA plans to publish a list of FAA-certified riggers operating in other countries. This hopes to assist international jumpers in preparing for their US trips. Additionally, PIA intends to encourage rigging schools to offer courses that streamline the certification process for foreign riggers who meet the FAA’s English proficiency requirements, ultimately aiming to expand the pool of available FAA-certified riggers outside the US.

FMI: www.pia.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.09.25)

“We respectfully call on the City of Mesa to: 1. Withdraw the landing fee proposal immediately 2. Engage with the aviation community before making decisions that impact safet>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.09.25): High Speed Taxiway

High Speed Taxiway A long radius taxiway designed and provided with lighting or marking to define the path of aircraft, traveling at high speed (up to 60 knots), from the runway ce>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.09.25)

Aero Linx: International Federation of Airworthiness (IFA) IFA uniquely combines together all those with responsibility for policies, principles and practices concerned with the co>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Diamond Aircraft Ind Inc DA20C1 (A1); Robinson Helicopter R44

Controller’s Expectation That VW02 Would Have Departed Sooner Led To An Inadequate Scan And Loss Of Situational Awareness Analysis: A Robinson R-44 helicopter N744AF, VW02 (V>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC