U.S. Disappointed In EU ETS Court Decision | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-08.25.25

Airborne-NextGen-08.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-08.27.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-08.28.25

AirborneUnlimited-08.22.25

Sat, Dec 24, 2011

U.S. Disappointed In EU ETS Court Decision

Officials Say They Have 'Strong Legal Objections'

A State Department official says that the U.S. Government is strongly opposed to the imposition of a European emissions cap-and-trade scheme on U.S. flagged airliners. The EU's highest court affirmed the Union's right to impose the fees in a decision handed down Wednesday.

"We continue to have strong legal and policy objections to the inclusion of flights by non-EU air carriers in the EU ETS," said Krishna R. Urs, deputy assistant secretary for transportation affairs at the U.S. State Department. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had warned of possible reprisals before the ruling was made public.

Reuters reports that China's state-run news agency Xinhua warned of a possible trade war if the tax is imposed, though that country's foreign ministry did not take that hard-line stance. Various non-European airline associations have also vehemently opposed the measure, and have released statements reiterating the opposition in the days following the ruling.

European officials say that the threats of trade wars or sanctions are "rhetoric," but some non-European analysts say that some kind of retaliation, even if it is minor, is to be expected to show that the U.S. disapproves of the tax. U.S.-flagged carriers have said they will grudgingly pay the tax if it comes to that, though they are considering their legal options. Legislation is still pending in Congress that would make it illegal for U.S. airlines to comply with the law, which could place the companies in a no-win situation.

The EU has vowed to "hold firm" on the fee, and points out that if U.S. and other airlines are taking "equivalent measures" then no tax will be imposed.

FMI: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_en.htm

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 08.22.25: ARC Spinoff, Nat'l Championship Air Races, Hawkins Accident

Also: H55 Completes American Tour, Robinson Trade-Ins, Retired AV-8B Harrier, NS-35 Mission Organizers of the iconic annual Air Race Classic will soon be opening registration for t>[...]

Airborne 08.27.25: Air Race Tkt Discounts, Europe AvGas, Deportation Flights?

Also: 500-Aircraft Deal With China, Florida ANG's F-35, FAA Denies Petition, UC Central Arkansas Aviation Academy The Reno Air Racing Association (RARA) is offering its apologies t>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 08.28.25: Midwest Av Expo, Vickers, Air Race Classic

Also: Air Race Tkts Marked Down, Kirk Hawkins Lost, GADFLY AI-Driven Engine Analysis, Sport Aviation Halls of Fame The Aero-News crew is getting ready to pack up a lot of video gea>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (08.30.25)

"This is just an absolute win win win. If there is a rejected takeoff we now have the confidence that the arrestor system will ensure passenger and crew safety." Source: FAA Admini>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (08.30.25): Low Approach

Low Approach An approach over an airport or runway following an instrument approach or a VFR approach including the go-around maneuver where the pilot intentionally does not make c>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC