Gulfstream Responds to FAA Fine | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.06.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.08.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-10.09.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.10.25

Mon, Jun 08, 2009

Gulfstream Responds to FAA Fine

Company Says No Intentional Violations

Fort Lauderdale Based Gulfstream Airlines is preparing a response to the $1.3 million fine imposed by the FAA after it found the company over-scheduled pilots and violated other regulations. The regional carrier operates flights in Florida and the Bahamas. In response to the FAA findings, Gulfstream President and CEO David Hackett told the South Florida Sun Sentinel that in a couple of "extremely isolated instances," records show scheduling discrepancies that were the result of "human error. In no case, did anyone here do anything wrong on purpose," Hackett said. Occasionally, "scheduling [pilots] may extend out because of a storm or something."

The FAA began the investigation of the carrier last summer, after a pilot who had been fired complained about scheduling. Reviewing the airline records, agency investigators found discrepancies between the company's electronic records and pilot log books for an 8 month period beginning in October, 2007.

FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown said the agency has no evidence the airline deliberately made record-keeping errors, but the discrepancies make it impossible to prove Gulfstream pilots followed FAA work rules. The agency found six pilots whose rest times had been violated, as well as a large number of problems in flight-time records from a June 2008 inspection.

Gulfstream's Hackett told the paper that regional airlines, including his own, look for ways to trim costs. But those tough business decisions do not compromise safety, he said.

Former Gulfstream pilot Kenny Edwards, who filed the whistleblower complaint that spurred the review of the airline by the FAA, says he was fired in December 2007 because he would not fly a Gulfstream aircraft he thought was unsafe.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

True Blue Power and Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics Power NBAA25 Coverage

Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics and True Blue Power ANN's NBAA 2025 Coverage... Visit Them At Booth #3436 True Blue Power Introduces New 45-watt Charging Ports for 14- and 2>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.15.25): En Route Automation System (EAS)

En Route Automation System (EAS) The complex integrated environment consisting of situation display systems, surveillance systems and flight data processing, remote devices, decisi>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.15.25)

“Our Kodiak aircraft family is uniquely designed to meet the rigorous demands of such deployments, bringing short takeoff and landing performance, robust cargo capacity and e>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.15.25)

Aero Linx: Australian Society of Air Safety Investigators (ASASI) The Australian Society of Air Safety Investigators (ASASI) was formed in 1978 after an inaugural meeting held in M>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Jeremy S Lezin Just SuperSTOL

Left Main Landing Gear Struck A Bush, And The Right Wingtip Impacted The Ground Analysis: According to the pilot of the tailwheel-equipped airplane, he noticed that the engine oil >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC