NATA Critical of FAA’s Wet Lease Notice | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.21.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.22.25

Airborne-FltTraining-10.23.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Sat, Nov 26, 2005

NATA Critical of FAA’s Wet Lease Notice

NATA has submitted comments critical of the FAA’s recent notice on certain aircraft lease agreements known as "wet leases,” because it overemphasizes the importance of management agreements instead of adopting a more holistic view of an air carrier’s operational control system.

The comments point out that much of the information and proposed guidance outlined in the notice, if followed by FAA inspectors, creates new unjustified regulatory burdens. Attempting to the address an apparent lack of understanding by the FAA, NATA's comments also elaborated on several unique elements of the on-demand charter industry.

“It is NATA’s belief that this goal [a more definitive demonstration of operational control in Part 135 operations] can be achieved through current regulations. FAA enforcement of current regulations and lack of understanding of how the Part 135 industry operates are the true issues. Certainly, operational control cannot be determined from one aspect of a contract, as this notice implies, but must consider each Part 135 air carrier as an entire operational structure,” the comments state.

“The Wet Lease guidance has morphed from a legitimate attempt by the FAA to clarify to the industry how to properly determine operational control into a legal exercise that falls far short of the goal by placing an inordinate amount of focus on management agreements rather than proper demonstration and evaluation of an air carrier’s entire operational control system.”

The association closed its comments with suggestions to the FAA for achieving their ultimate goal; increased safety through better implementation and demonstration of operational control.

“It is imperative that the FAA fully understand the intricacies of the on-demand air charter industry before they issue burdensome new requirements which fall far short of addressing the problem and while proper enforcement of current regulatory requirements could much better address the true issue of unclear or improperly delegated operational control,” concluded NATA President James K. Coyne (pictured, above).

FMI: www.nata.aero

Advertisement

More News

Airborne-Flight Training 10.23.25: PanAm Back?, Spirit Cuts, Affordable Expo

Also: USAF Pilots, Advanced Aircrew Academy, ATC Hiring, Hop-A-Jet Sues Pan American is attempting a comeback. Aviation merchant bank AVi8 Air Capital, alongside Pan American Globa>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 10.23.25: PanAm Back?, Spirit Cuts, Affordable Expo

Also: USAF Pilots, Advanced Aircrew Academy, ATC Hiring, Hop-A-Jet Sues Pan American is attempting a comeback. Aviation merchant bank AVi8 Air Capital, alongside Pan American Globa>[...]

Airborne 10.22.25: Rez Takes Plane, DJI v US Drone Ban, HK 747 Cargo Accident

Also: DHS Under Fire, Air New Zealand, ALPA Praises Bipartisan Bill, Spirit Budget Cuts The Minnesota Pilots Association has issued an advisory regarding overflights of the Red Lak>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Portrait of the U.S. Transportation Safety Institute

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Beauty Amongst Ghastly Federal Agencies Founded in 1971 and based in Oklahoma City, the Transportation Safety Institute (TSI) is a subsidiary of the U.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.21.25): Flight Check

Flight Check A call sign prefix used by FAA aircraft engaged in flight inspection/certification of navigational aids and flight procedures. The word “recorded” may be a>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC