Body Scanners May Not Be So Private After All | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 14, 2010

Body Scanners May Not Be So Private After All

Test Mode Allows Images To Be Saved, Transmitted

Since their introduction, privacy advocates have publicly worried that images from full-body scans at the airport might wind up on the internet. TSA assured us on its website that "The machines have zero storage capability."
 
At some airports where the technology is in use, TSA plays a video in the screening area which asserts, "...the system has no way to save, transmit or print the image."
 
But CNN reports that EPIC, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, found that the machines have a test mode in which the images can not only be stored, but transmitted. EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg says that opens the possibilities of abuse by insiders, or even hackers. The  "Level Z" authority for TSA allows the security agency to disable privacy filters and to export raw image files.
 
EPIC obtained the information on the machines through a Freedom of Information Act request. Rotenberg is critical of what he calls "slick promotion" by the TSA. "[I]f you look at the actual technical specifications and you read the vendor contracts, you come to understand that these machines are capable of doing far more than the TSA has let on."
 
TSA has responded by saying adequate safeguards are in place. The officer viewing the images cannot see the passenger being scanned, the machines are not networked and cannot be hacked, no cellphones or other photographic devices are allowed in the viewing rooms, and violators are subject to serious discipline or removal.
 
All of which may be true, but then YouTube is filled with bootleg concert videos from venues where no cameras are allowed, and TSA reportedly has declined to cooperate in the prosecution of its workers when they're caught stealing at airports, citing security concerns.

FMI: http://epic.org, www.tsa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.24.25: ANN's 30th!, Starship’s V3 Booster Boom, Earhart Records

Also: 1st-Ever Space Crime Was a Fraud, IAE Buys Diamonds, Kennon Bows Out, Perseverance Rover An interesting moment came about this past Sunday as ANN CEO, Jim Campbell, noted tha>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: DeltaHawk Aero Engine Defies Convention

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Deviation from the Historical Mean Racine, Wisconsin-based DeltaHawk is a privately-held manufacturer of reciprocating engines for aircraft and hybrid >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Glasair GlaStar

Smoke Began Entering The Cockpit During The Landing Flare, And Then The Pilot Noticed Flames On The Right Side Of The Airplane Analysis: The pilot reported that about 30 minutes in>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.22.25): Remote Communications Outlet (RCO)

Remote Communications Outlet (RCO) An unmanned communications facility remotely controlled by air traffic personnel. RCOs serve FSSs. Remote Transmitter/Receivers (RTR) serve termi>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC