'Columbia' Foam Test Shocks Engineers | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jun 05, 2003

'Columbia' Foam Test Shocks Engineers

Damage in Test Much Worse Than Expected

Jeff Franks wrote for Reuters, "A test firing of insulation foam at a replica space shuttle wing struck with such power that it shocked witnesses and added force to the theory that a foam strike led to the breakup of shuttle Columbia, a member of the board investigating the accident said on Wednesday."

In fact, Scott Hubbard, director of NASA's Ames Research Center (CA), told reporters, "I thought, 'Oh my god, this is more than I expected ... this isn't just a light bounce.'"

The test was conducted last week. Another, using the real wing from Discovery, is scheduled for today (Thursday). Because the Shuttle wing is less-tough than the mockup used in last week's test, many are expecting the damage to the real wing to be even worse.

Since the breakup of Columbia (right) on February 1, that killed all seven aboard, the favorite theory of the cause of the disaster has been damage to the heat-shielding oblative tiles, caused by a strike of a chunk of foam that broke off above the orbiter, from the main fuel tank. The impact speed was estimated at over 500 mph.

Although NASA knew quickly that the foam had hit the shuttle, this type of incident had happened before, and hadn't caused any appreciable damage; the breakup, days later, took NASA by surprise. NASA had apparently never before run a test like last week's.

The Columbia Accident Investigation Board is expected to submit a final report in July.

FMI: www.spaceflight.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra Aircraft Announces the Extra 330SX

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): An Even Faster Rolling Extra! Jim Campbell joined General Manager of Extra Aircraft Duncan Koerbel at AirVenture 2023 to talk about what’s up and>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.15.25)

“Receiving our Permit to Fly and starting Phase 4 marks a defining moment for Vertical Aerospace. Our team has spent months verifying every core system under close regulatory>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.15.25): Middle Marker

Middle Marker A marker beacon that defines a point along the glideslope of an ILS normally located at or near the point of decision height (ILS Category I). It is keyed to transmit>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Lancair 320

The Experienced Pilot Chose To Operate In Instrument Meteorological Conditions Without An Instrument Flight Rules Clearance Analysis: The airplane was operated on a personal cross->[...]

Airborne 11.14.25: Last DC-8 Retires, Boeing Recovery, Teeny Trig TXP

Also: ATI Strike Prep, Spirit Still Troubled, New CubCrafters Dealership, A-29 Super Tucano Samaritan’s Purse is officially moving its historic Douglas DC-8 cargo jet into re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC