'Columbia' Foam Test Shocks Engineers | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jun 05, 2003

'Columbia' Foam Test Shocks Engineers

Damage in Test Much Worse Than Expected

Jeff Franks wrote for Reuters, "A test firing of insulation foam at a replica space shuttle wing struck with such power that it shocked witnesses and added force to the theory that a foam strike led to the breakup of shuttle Columbia, a member of the board investigating the accident said on Wednesday."

In fact, Scott Hubbard, director of NASA's Ames Research Center (CA), told reporters, "I thought, 'Oh my god, this is more than I expected ... this isn't just a light bounce.'"

The test was conducted last week. Another, using the real wing from Discovery, is scheduled for today (Thursday). Because the Shuttle wing is less-tough than the mockup used in last week's test, many are expecting the damage to the real wing to be even worse.

Since the breakup of Columbia (right) on February 1, that killed all seven aboard, the favorite theory of the cause of the disaster has been damage to the heat-shielding oblative tiles, caused by a strike of a chunk of foam that broke off above the orbiter, from the main fuel tank. The impact speed was estimated at over 500 mph.

Although NASA knew quickly that the foam had hit the shuttle, this type of incident had happened before, and hadn't caused any appreciable damage; the breakup, days later, took NASA by surprise. NASA had apparently never before run a test like last week's.

The Columbia Accident Investigation Board is expected to submit a final report in July.

FMI: www.spaceflight.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.26.25)

“We are disappointed with today’s verdict and respectfully disagree with the outcome. From the outset, we have maintained that Gogo’s independently developed 5G t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.26.25): Takeoff Hold Lights (THL)

Takeoff Hold Lights (THL) The THL system is composed of in-pavement lighting in a double, longitudinal row of lights aligned either side of the runway centerline. The lights are fo>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.26.25)

Aero Linx: The 1-26 Association (Schweizer) The Association’s goal is to foster the helpfulness, the camaraderie, and the opportunity for head-to-head competition that is fou>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 11.20.25: Sonex $$$, SnF 26 MOSAIC DAY, P. Ponk STCs

Also: Elfin 20 Journey, BASE Jumper Rescue, Pipistrel Makes Waves, EAA Hall of Fame, Affordable Flying Expo 2026 Like most of the industry, kit manufacturer Sonex has been hit by t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.27.25)

Aero Linx: The de Havilland Moth Club Ltd The de Havilland Moth Club evolved from a belief that an association of owners and operators of Moth aeroplanes should be formed to create>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC