Repair Stations Object To Language In Revised Regulations | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.07.24

Airborne-NextGen-10.08.24

Airborne-Unlimited-10.09.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-10.10.24

Airborne-Unlimited-10.11.24

Sat, Feb 07, 2015

Repair Stations Object To Language In Revised Regulations

Says 'Or New' Unacceptable Language Not Included In NPRM

On Jan. 29, the Aeronautical Repair Station Association (ARSA) asked the FAA to clarify when the new owner of a repair station can apply for an amended versus a new certificate.

The change to the repair station rule, which became effective Nov.10, 2014, revised Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 145.57(b). That section states the new owner of repair station assets “…must apply for an amended or new certificate in accordance with § 145.51.”

The addition of the words “or new” was not even mentioned in the notice of proposed rulemaking, but the FAA reasoning is that “[t]he revision clarifies that a new owner will need to apply for a new certificate only if the new owner chooses to operate as a repair station.”

The unnecessary change has resulted in confusion, rather than clarity. While ARSA recognizes that a repair station certificate cannot be transferred, amending one takes fewer resources for both industry and agency. Considering the current waiting time for a new certificate can be up to two-years, any uncertainty regarding the application is unacceptable.

“It should be very clear by now how much trouble can be caused by a misplaced or unnecessary word in the regulations,” said Sarah MacLeod, ARSA’s executive director. “I say that because ARSA has been making exactly that point for months: Since the new repair station rule was announced last year this association has been working to scrap every one of these ‘broken parts,’ since they offer no safety benefit to the flying public and represent immeasurable administrative burden for repair stations.”

Along with its letter, ARSA submitted suggested changes to guidance material. The association asked the agency make clear an application for a new certificate is only required where the new owner opts for a new certificate number. And even then, the processing interval should depend upon the changes the new owner makes to the location, housing, facilities, equipment and personnel.

FMI: http://arsa.org/news-media/arsa-works

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.13.24)

“Achieving this milestone and ensuring the timely delivery of the first six aircraft required extensive coordination and cooperation among industry partners, PMA-265 and the >[...]

Major Milestone For Hornet Extension Project

Significant Accomplishment For RCAF And PMA-265 Collaboration The Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) announced that the CF-18 Hornet Extension Project (HEP) has achieved initial Opera>[...]

PHI Adds Airbus Helicopters Into Service In Australia

Two H175s Will Support Multiple Roles PHI Aviation in Australia has placed two Airbus H175 helicopters into service and will be based out of the company’s Broome location in >[...]

Launch Event Held For New Full Flight Sim In Dubai

Ansett Aviation Opens New Airbus A320 ceo/neo Training Center Ansett Aviation Training held a launch celebration to showcase the opening of its brand new Airbus A320 ceo/neo full f>[...]

Pilot Rescued After Noseover in Inguadona Lake

Man Pulled From the Water and Treated for Minor Injuries On October 8, an Air Tractor AT-802A Fire Boss made a noseover landing while performing a routine proficiency flight over C>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC