EAA Reacts To FAA Budget Proposal | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.10.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.07.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sun, Feb 12, 2006

EAA Reacts To FAA Budget Proposal

EAA maintains Aviation Trust Fund income healthy and the balance is growing; inappropriate distribution is the problem

The nation's general aviation airports are left out in the cold in the new FAA budget proposal forwarded by the Bush Administration this week, as funding for the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) has been chopped by more than 20 percent.

EAA analyzed the budget proposal, finding that the remaining funds are likely to be used for expansion at large metropolitan airports. That would leave critical maintenance and improvement projects at GA airports delayed or canceled.

"Local airport infrastructures are left wanting in this budget proposal," said Doug Macnair, EAA vice president of government relations (pictured below, right).

"Again the proposed FAA budget takes money specifically designated for airport improvements and other capital expenditures, and uses it to fund general operations, instead of making the hard decisions on the real problem: out-of-control spending."

That AIP cut is a major part of the reduced FAA funding total for Fiscal Year 2007, a total that is down some $600 million from the previous budget. While the general fund contribution for FAA does not decrease under the proposal, the money taken from the Aviation Trust Fund - the funding from the GA fuel tax and airline passenger-ticket taxes supposedly earmarked to build and enhance aviation infrastructure - has increased.

Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta has alluded to the need for aviation user fees in recent statements, demanding the need for a "stable, predictable revenue stream" for FAA through other funding methods. In the aftermath of the budget's release, he cited "general agreement" on a funding method that depends on revenues collected and services provided.

"The FAA services provide benefit to every citizen of the country, whether they fly or not, so the general fund is the best way to equitably fund the operation of the nation's air infrastructure," Macnair said. "There is no 'general agreement' on this point except by those who are pushing for a user-fee system.

"The FAA's funding crisis does not come from a lack of financial resources from aviation users being poured into the Airport and Airways Trust Fund. Contrary to what the FAA has been saying about declining industry funding, the Trust Fund balance is predicted to increase dramatically between now and 2011, to a predicted $15 billion. The FAA shortfall comes from the White House inadequately funding the operation of the world's finest air traffic system in an all-out effort to reduce the burgeoning federal deficit. Instead, the White House budget proposal robs the Airport Improvement Program to pay for the expense of running the air traffic system. And general aviation is the loser."

Macnair added that EAA also has concerns about additional funding earmarked for the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS), which has the potential to impose additional economic and regulatory burdens on aircraft owners. This plan calls for potential new equipment requirements such as Automated Dependent Surveillance (ADS-B), which would provide great benefits such as making weather and air traffic information available in the cockpit.

However, there is a disturbing trend in the NGATS planning toward mandatory installation of these new technologies to use the national airspace system. That would carry a significant cost burden and be a severe detriment to non-electrically supported aircraft and other aircraft not capable of supporting such technologies.

"EAA members are innovators who have always been among the first to develop, embrace and use the latest technology," Macnair said.

"But careening headlong into such a program, without considering its ramifications on the recreational aviation community as a whole, could leave many thousands of aircraft owners without access to major parts of the nation's airspace."

EAA will continue to engage with legislators and federal officials to defend its members against measures that would lessen access to flying or add burdensome regulations.

FMI: www.eaa.org

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Mayman Aerospace Speeder Dazzles Oshkosh Crowds

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): A Moniker Well-Chosen Founded in 2021 by serial entrepreneur David Mayman and headquartered in New York City, Mayman Aerospace is the designer and manu>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Socata TBM 700

The Controller Provided The Pilot With A Low Altitude Alert And The Altimeter Setting That Was Current At The Time On October 13, 2025, at about 0815 eastern daylight time, a Socat>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.11.25): Outer Marker

Outer Marker A marker beacon at or near the glideslope intercept altitude of an ILS approach. It is keyed to transmit two dashes per second on a 400 Hz tone, which is received aura>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.11.25)

Aero Linx: Seaplane Pilots Association The Seaplane Pilots Association is the only organization in the world solely focused on representing the interests of seaplane pilots, owners>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.11.25)

“While business aviation is fully included in the FAA’s traffic reductions, we know that our sector will continue to pursue mandatory and voluntary means to ensure we a>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC