Sailors' Families File Complaint In 2007 Navy Helicopter Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Jan 26, 2009

Sailors' Families File Complaint In 2007 Navy Helicopter Accident

MH-60S Suffered Tail Rotor Failure Off San Clemente Island

A California law firm has filed a Complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of the families of three Navy sailors who died when their helicopter suffered an apparent tail rotor drive failure and went down in the Pacific Ocean during a training exercise two years ago.

The San Mateo-based firm of O'Reilly & Danko filed the Complaint on behalf of the spouses, families and relatives of Petty Officer First Class Cory Helman, Lt. Adam Dyer and Petty Officer 2nd Class Christopher H. Will. As ANN reported, the three sailors were killed when their MH-60S Knighthawk crashed during a training exercise off San Clemente Island on January 26, 2007.

Named as Defendants in the Complaint are the manufacturers of the Knighthawk, and of several of its components.

The Navy's Judge Advocate General Manual (JAGMAN) investigation found the reason for the crash to be "undetermined"... but, the law firm asserts, the JAGMAN's final report omitted one investigator's opinion that shortly before the pilot issued a "mayday" call the helicopter experienced a failure of the tail rotor drive system.

The crew members' survivors hired their own experts to look at the matter, the law firm adds, and asked that they be allowed to inspect the wreckage. The Navy initially indicated it would allow the inspection... but then made an about face and refused absent a court order.

"The Helmans, Dyers and Wills still have not received an answer to why the helicopter carrying their loved ones crashed into the Pacific," said their attorney, Michael S. Danko. "They just want to know what happened, and they want to make sure no other military families suffer the same losses they did on January 26, 2007."

FMI: www.oreillylaw.com/, www.navy.mil

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.24.25: ANN's 30th!, Starship’s V3 Booster Boom, Earhart Records

Also: 1st-Ever Space Crime Was a Fraud, IAE Buys Diamonds, Kennon Bows Out, Perseverance Rover An interesting moment came about this past Sunday as ANN CEO, Jim Campbell, noted tha>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: DeltaHawk Aero Engine Defies Convention

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Deviation from the Historical Mean Racine, Wisconsin-based DeltaHawk is a privately-held manufacturer of reciprocating engines for aircraft and hybrid >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Glasair GlaStar

Smoke Began Entering The Cockpit During The Landing Flare, And Then The Pilot Noticed Flames On The Right Side Of The Airplane Analysis: The pilot reported that about 30 minutes in>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.22.25): Remote Communications Outlet (RCO)

Remote Communications Outlet (RCO) An unmanned communications facility remotely controlled by air traffic personnel. RCOs serve FSSs. Remote Transmitter/Receivers (RTR) serve termi>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC