Bomb-Dropper May Yet Face Charges | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jun 26, 2003

Bomb-Dropper May Yet Face Charges

He Refused Deal; Doesn't Trust Administrative Hearing

Air Force Major Harry Schmidt doesn't think he did anything wrong, in the accidental bombing that killed four Canadian soldiers and wounded eight, in April of last year.

The Air Force, wishing to keep the details of the mishap as quiet as possible, offered deals to Schmidt and another pilot, deals which would allow them to not face courts-martial and possible homicide charges.

The lead pilot on the deadly mission, Maj. Richard Umbach, requested and was granted early retirement last week, without admitting guilt; Schmidt was nailed with an Article 15 proceeding, which could have led to serious charges, including forfeiture of one half of one-month’s pay per month for two months, arrest in quarters for 30 days, restriction to specified geographical limits for 60 days and a reprimand. Schmidt’s actions were also to have been reviewed by a flying-evaluation board to determine whether he should be permitted to fly Air Force aircraft in the future. A board review is not dependent on the outcome of the separate Article 15 action.

Maj. Schmidt wants his day in court -- such 'court' as a court-martial proceeding can be. In a court-martial, he could face charges of aggravated assault, involuntary manslaughter and dereliction of duty. Still, he sees a court-martial as a better deal than a hearing in which the judges' minds are made up, ahead of time.

An AP report says, "Schmidt’s lawyer, Charles W. Gittins, said in an e-mailed statement that the pilot decided against the administrative hearing because he believed he could not get a fair hearing. The administrative hearing would have been overseen by Lt. Gen. Bruce Carlson, who Gittins said has already determined Schmidt is guilty."

Schmidt, 37, now an Illinois National Guardsman, was an instructor at the Navy's "Top Gun" school, at the end of a career as a decorated Naval aviator.

FMI: www.af.mil

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.13.25): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.13.25)

“We have performed extensive ground testing by comparing warm up times, full power tethered pulls, and overall temperatures in 100 degree environments against other aircraft >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Gippsland GA-8

While Taxiing To Parking The Right Landing Gear Leg Collapsed, Resulting In Substantial Damage Analysis: The pilot made a normal approach with full flaps and landed on the runway. >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Historically Unique -- Marlin Horst's Exquisite Fairchild 71

From 2014 (YouTube Edition): Exotic Rebuild Reveals Aerial Work Of Art During EAA AirVenture 2014, ANN's Michael Maya Charles took the time to get a history lesson about a great ai>[...]

Airborne 12.12.25: Global 8000, Korea Pilot Honors, AV-30 Update

Also: Project Talon, McFarlane Acquisition, Sky-Tec Service, JPL Earth Helo Tests Bombardier has earned a round of applause from the business aviation community, celebrating the fo>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC