FAA Proposes $585,725 Civil Penalty Against Corporate Air | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Columbus day Holiday

Airborne-Unlimited-10.15.24

Airborne-NextGen-10.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-10.10.24

Airborne-Unlimited-10.18.24

Fri, Feb 18, 2011

FAA Proposes $585,725 Civil Penalty Against Corporate Air

Alleges Company Operated An Aircraft Without Proper Maintenance

The FAA is proposing a $585,725 civil penalty against Corporate Air of Billings, MT, for allegedly operating a Shorts SD-3-30 twin-turboprop cargo aircraft when it was not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.


Shorts SD-3 File Photo

The FAA alleges Corporate Air failed to maintain the aircraft under the company's general maintenance manual, which requires daily post-flight inspections that include examining the exterior skin for corrosion. In addition, the maintenance manual requires structural inspections on the basis of flight hours or flights.

The FAA alleges that Corporate Air operated the aircraft in violation of regulations on at least 81 revenue flights between Dec. 21, 2009 and Feb. 4, 2010 with corrosion that had not been detected during the post-flight inspections. The FAA also alleges that structural inspections were not conducted at the required intervals, between March 16, 2006 and February 3, 2010, in violation of federal regulations.

Corporate Air operates charter and air taxi service under Part 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations and makes daily feeder cargo flights under contract to a major next-day air package airline.

"Keeping aircraft well-maintained and in good condition must be a top priority for any operator," said FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt.  "All operators must comply with maintenance requirements."

Corporate Air has 30 days from the receipt of the FAA's enforcement letter to respond to the agency.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Textron Proposes New Contract to Striking Machinists

Presented Just Three Weeks After its “Best and Final” Offer Three weeks ago, Textron Aviation presented its “best and final” offer to its striking machinist>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22

After The Airplane Exited The Left Side Of The Runway It Continued Into A Tree... On September 25, 2024, at 1833 central daylight time, a Cirrus SR22 airplane, N565CP, was substant>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.18.24)

“Our focus this decade is to win the NASA Commercial LEO Destination (CLD) contract and build the successor to the International Space Station. To achieve this, we will first>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.18.24): Air Carrier District Office

Air Carrier District Office An FAA field office serving an assigned geographical area, staffed with Flight Standards personnel serving the aviation industry and the general public >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.18.24)

Aero Linx: The Vertical Flight Society (VFS) The Vertical Flight Society, formerly the American Helicopter Society (AHS), is the non-profit technical society for the advancement of>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC