FAA Rescinds SAFE-Requested Proposal To Allow Greater Simulator Use | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Jan 20, 2015

FAA Rescinds SAFE-Requested Proposal To Allow Greater Simulator Use

Was To Have Gone Into Effect In Less Than A Week

Less than a week before it was to take effect, the FAA pulled the SAFE-requested direct-to-final rule to allow pilots up to 20 simulator hours toward an instrument rating, citing “adverse comments.”  The unexpected January 15 move leaves pilots limited to the 10 simulator hours allowed by FAR 61.65.

A SAFE analysis found only one adverse public comment, filed December 17, in the FAA’s docket.  It had been countered by an immediate SAFE protest labeling the comment as “personal opinion, lacking substantiation and contrary to current education doctrine regarding use of training devices.”
 
Agency spokesman Les Dorr confirmed that the FAA is required by Federal regulations to withdraw any direct-to-final rule if even one adverse comment is received.  Proposed regulations that are not expected to draw any protest from the public, such as this one, are often issued as direct-to-final rules.
 
“We are disappointed that this beneficial rule change was withdrawn based on a single negative comment out of the hundreds submitted on this issue,” said John Dorcey, interim Executive Director of the Society of Aviation and Flight Educators (SAFE).  “We understand the FAA’s need to follow their protocols but will continue our efforts to get these changes enacted.”   He said SAFE will ask the FAA to expedite re-issue as a conventional NPRM not subject to dismissal due to a single negative comment.

Dorr said he is not aware of further planned FAA action, although the original rule-making cited substantial advantages of additional simulator time, including relieving burdens on pilots seeking to obtain aeronautical experience, training and certification.  It called simulators an “effective, safe and affordable means of obtaining pilot experience,” and said the rule was necessary to bring the regulations in line with current needs and activities of general aviation training community and pilots.

“The fact remains that the existing FAR 61.65(i) is outdated,” said Dorcey. “Both before and after this regulation was issued in 2009, the FAA issued hundreds of Letters of Authorization to simulator manufacturers permitting simulator hours in excess of the regulation.”
 
SAFE, now representing nearly 1,000 of the nation’s top flight instructors and aviation educators, works to create a safer aviation environment by supporting aviation educators with mentoring opportunities, educational resources, and other benefits; inspiring professionalism through promotion and recognition of excellence and enhanced education; representing aviation educators through interaction with the aviation industry and government and promoting learning in all areas of aviation for everyone at every level.

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.safepilots.org

 


Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra; the Airplane, the Man, and His Grand DeLand Plan

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Germany’s Best by Way of Florida Established in 1980 by German aerobatic pilot Walter Extra as a means by which to design and develop his own air>[...]

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.27.25)

“Achieving PMA for the S-1200 Series magnetos is another step in expanding our commitment to providing the aviation community with the most trusted and durable ‘firewal>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.27.25): Ultralight Vehicle

Ultralight Vehicle A single-occupant aeronautical vehicle operated for sport or recreational purposes which does not require FAA registration, an airworthiness certificate, or pilo>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.27.25)

Aero Linx: The de Havilland Moth Club Ltd The de Havilland Moth Club evolved from a belief that an association of owners and operators of Moth aeroplanes should be formed to create>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC