Pirker Settles Case With The FAA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Sat, Jan 24, 2015

Pirker Settles Case With The FAA

UAV Pilot Will Pay $1,100, Admits No Wrongdoing

Facing a possibly lengthy court battle and a $10,000 fine, Raphael Pirker  has decided to settle his case with the FAA, but admits no wrongdoing for flying a UAV near the University of Virginia in 2011.

Pirker has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $1,100, according to a letter from the Department of Transportation. In a statement posted on his Team Black Sheep website, Pirker said "We are pleased that the case ignited an important international conversation about the civilian use of drones, the appropriate level of governmental regulation concerning this new technology, and even spurred the regulators to open new paths to the approval of certain commercial drone operations.”

Pirker had been using his UAV to take pictures for the University, which the FAA said was a commercial use and in violation of its rules. Pirker had maintained all along that the rules were beyond the FAA's authority because it has not yet completed the formal rulemaking process.

In the settlement letter, the FAA lays out chapter and verse its complaints with Pirker, including flying his UAV through a tunnel tath "contained moving vehicles" and operating the aircraft within approximately 50 feet of numerous individuals and 20 feet of a street "containing numerous pedestrians and cars." For those reasons, and others, the FAA determined that Pirker "operated an aircraft in a careless or reckless manner so as to endanger the life or property of another."

The FAA also pointed out that Pirker "did not possess a Federal Aviation Administration pilot certificate."

Pirker's deadline for paying the $1,100 fine was Thursday. The letter states: "Respondent does not admit to any allegation of fact or law herein, and by not contesting this amended Order of Assessment is resolving the matter solely to avoid the expense of litigation."

FMI: FAA Letter

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.26.24)

"General aviation is at the forefront of developing and introducing innovative technologies that will transform the entire aviation industry..." Source: Kyle Martin, Vice President>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.27.24): Direct

Direct Straight line flight between two navigational aids, fixes, points, or any combination thereof. When used by pilots in describing off-airway routes, points defining direct ro>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.27.24)

Aero Linx: Women in Corporate Aviation Women in Corporate Aviation support individuals seeking career advancement and professional development in the business aviation industry. Me>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.27.24)

“We would like to thank the many volunteers that help throughout the year to pull off the event, as well as the several reviewers, judges, and SURVICE staff that provide team>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC