Increasing UAV Popularity Raises The Question: Who Owns Your Airspace | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Mon, May 18, 2015

Increasing UAV Popularity Raises The Question: Who Owns Your Airspace

At Least 17 States Have Passed Laws Restricting UAV Flights

With more and more people buying UAVs, and more of them being equipped with some kind of camera, communities nationwide are racing to catch up with the technology in terms of laws and regulations for their use ... or to prevent that use.

At least 17 states have passed laws regulating the use of UAVs, and users say that many of them are unnecessarily heavy-handed, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. Laws came as people flew UAVs, often costing under $100, over homes, populated areas, and crime scenes. And Richard Beary, president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, says that many departments are not equipped to regulate airspace.

The FAA says it has jurisdiction over airspace all the way to the ground, and that its rules will take precedence over any state or local law or regulation. But while it has been somewhat effective in regulating commercial use of the UAVs, it is largely prohibited from regulating non-commercial uses by a law passed in 2012. Still, that has not stopped some states from passing very restrictive laws about the use of UAVs, and some towns have banned them altogether.

The FAA says that, as long as non-commercial UAVs don't endanger people, they can hover over private property legally. However, the FAA says that local "noise and nuisance" laws could be used to regulate flight in some areas.

Privacy is another issue, and some state laws have banned the capture of still images or video with UAVs on private property without the express consent of the property owner.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Up Close And Personal - The Aeroshell Aerobatic Team at Oshkosh

From 2014 (YouTube Version): One Of The Airshow World's Pre-Eminent Formation Teams Chats About The State Of The Industry At EAA AirVenture 2014, ANN News Editor Tom Patton gets th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.13.25): Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN)

Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) An ultra-high frequency electronic rho-theta air navigation aid which provides suitably equipped aircraft a continuous indication of bearing and dis>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.13.25)

Aero Linx: Doobert Hi, we're Chris & Rachael Roy, founders and owners of Doobert. Chris is a technology guy in his “day” job and used his experience to create Doobe>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Pitts S2

The Airplane Was Spinning In A Nose-Down Attitude Before It Impacted Terrain On June 20, 2025, at 0900 eastern daylight time, a Pitts Aerobatics S-2B, N79AV, was destroyed when it >[...]

Airborne 07.09.25: B-17 Sentimental Journey, Airport Scandal, NORAD Intercepts

Also: United Elite Sues, Newark ATC Transitions, Discovery Moves?, Textron @ KOSH The Commemorative Air Force Airbase Arizona is taking its “Flying Legends of Victory Tour&rd>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC