Increasing UAV Popularity Raises The Question: Who Owns Your Airspace | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.09.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.11.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.12.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.06.25

Mon, May 18, 2015

Increasing UAV Popularity Raises The Question: Who Owns Your Airspace

At Least 17 States Have Passed Laws Restricting UAV Flights

With more and more people buying UAVs, and more of them being equipped with some kind of camera, communities nationwide are racing to catch up with the technology in terms of laws and regulations for their use ... or to prevent that use.

At least 17 states have passed laws regulating the use of UAVs, and users say that many of them are unnecessarily heavy-handed, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. Laws came as people flew UAVs, often costing under $100, over homes, populated areas, and crime scenes. And Richard Beary, president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, says that many departments are not equipped to regulate airspace.

The FAA says it has jurisdiction over airspace all the way to the ground, and that its rules will take precedence over any state or local law or regulation. But while it has been somewhat effective in regulating commercial use of the UAVs, it is largely prohibited from regulating non-commercial uses by a law passed in 2012. Still, that has not stopped some states from passing very restrictive laws about the use of UAVs, and some towns have banned them altogether.

The FAA says that, as long as non-commercial UAVs don't endanger people, they can hover over private property legally. However, the FAA says that local "noise and nuisance" laws could be used to regulate flight in some areas.

Privacy is another issue, and some state laws have banned the capture of still images or video with UAVs on private property without the express consent of the property owner.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.04.25: G100UL Legal Decision, FAA v Starship, Laser Conviction

Also: AV-8B Harrier For CAF Arizona, Boeing Gets ODA, Army NG Rescue, Longitude To C. America A California Superior Court judge recently ruled that GAMI’s unleaded avgas does>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.09.25): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.09.25)

Aero Linx: T-6A Texan II The T-6A Texan II is a single-engine, two-seat primary trainer designed to train Joint Primary Pilot Training, or JPPT, students in basic flying skills com>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Evektor Aerotechnik EV97

At The Time Of The Accident The Wind Was 140° At 11 Knots, Gusting To 19 Knots Analysis: According to the pilot, she was on a multi-day cross-country flight in the experimental>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC