Democrats Against De-Nationalizing ATC | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Thu, Aug 21, 2003

Democrats Against De-Nationalizing ATC

In a Democratic Administration, Republicans Would Likely Oppose It

August 20, 2003
The Honorable Norman Mineta
Transportation Secretary
U.S. Department of Transportation
400 7th Street, S.W
Washington, DC 20590

Dear Mr. Secretary:
We write to express our grave concern about the recent conduct of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in lobbying Congress for the authority to privatize America's air traffic control (ATC) system.

Although the FAA has said that it had no intention of privatizing ATC functions, it worked behind closed doors to gain authority to replace federal controllers at 69 airport towers with contract employees of private companies. Then, in an apparent private deal with the Alaska delegation, the FAA agreed to be prohibited from privatizing Alaska airports. How, Mr. Secretary, can you defend a system that has one standard for Alaska, and another for the other 49 states? If privatization did not pose a threat to safety and efficiency, why would the experienced legislators of the Alaska delegation bother to exempt their own airports?

And now, in an effort to win Congressional approval of the conference report on Vision 100-Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act ("Conference Report"), the FAA appears ready to use a similar scheme to exempt towers in other states. It seems the Administration has different standards for air traffic control towers depending on the votes the Administration needs to pass the Conference Report. It has recently come to light in a report in the Tulsa World that the FAA has promised Senator Nickles that the Riverside Airport control tower in his home state of Oklahoma will not be privatized. It is not surprising that Oklahomans are concerned about privatization, and that concern was reflected in the support the Lautenberg amendment received from Senator Inhofe. The Administration will need Senator Inhofe, and others of the 11 Republicans who supported the Lautenberg amendment, to have a change of heart in order to pass its plan to privatize air traffic services.

Once again we ask, if privatization poses no threats to safety and efficiency, why are members of Congress demanding they be exempted from the program?

This is not the first instance of improper behavior on behalf of the Administration on this issue.  Shortly before Senate consideration of the Lautenberg amendment in June, Administration officials sent a factually incorrect e-mail to many Senate offices (except that of Senator Lautenberg) in a failed attempt to lobby against the Lautenberg amendment. The e-mail claimed the scope of the proposed Lautenberg provision was much broader than it actually was. This instance was chronicled in a hearing by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, on July 8.

Safe and efficient air travel for all Americans is a non-partisan commitment from both the House and the Senate. The FAA is charged with protecting the safety of air travel, not cutting political deals-especially when those deals appear to be based on no sound safety or economic policy, but rather political calculations. To that point, we are asking you to instruct the FAA Administrator to report to Congress on any and all arrangements to exempt FAA-run control towers from being contracted out. We assure you that failure to report fully and promptly on this matter will lead to a loss in confidence among ourselves and our colleagues in the Congress in the leadership of the FAA.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Frank R. Lautenberg (lower photo, flanked by union friends), U.S. Senator (D-NJ)
James L. Oberstar (top photo, with TSA buddy James Loy, at AOPA convention), Ranking Democratic Member, U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

[At the risk of sounding cynical, we find it odd that the debate never mentions the obvious union interests that are at stake, or the vested interests of those who fly -- us -- in having everybody else pay for the ATC services we use. While not the only issues, they certainly are relevant, and are huge motivators for the politics behind 'safety' --ed.]

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.25)

Aero Linx: International Federation of Airworthiness (IFA) We aim to be the most internationally respected independent authority on the subject of Airworthiness. IFA uniquely combi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.25): Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF)

Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF) The frequency band between 300 and 3,000 MHz. The bank of radio frequencies used for military air/ground voice communications. In some instances this may >[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Virtual Reality Painting--PPG Leverages Technology for Training

From 2019 (YouTube Edition): Learning To Paint Without Getting Any On Your Hands PPG's Aerospace Coatings Academy is a tool designed to teach everything one needs to know about all>[...]

Airborne 05.02.25: Joby Crewed Milestone, Diamond Club, Canadian Pilot Insurance

Also: Sustainable Aircraft Test Put Aside, More Falcon 9 Ops, Wyoming ANG Rescue, Oreo Cookie Into Orbit Joby Aviation has reason to celebrate, recently completing its first full t>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC