'Columbia' Foam Test Shocks Engineers | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-01.13.25

Airborne-NextGen-01.14.25

Airborne-Unlimited-01.15.25

Airborne-FltTraining-01.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-01.17.25

Thu, Jun 05, 2003

'Columbia' Foam Test Shocks Engineers

Damage in Test Much Worse Than Expected

Jeff Franks wrote for Reuters, "A test firing of insulation foam at a replica space shuttle wing struck with such power that it shocked witnesses and added force to the theory that a foam strike led to the breakup of shuttle Columbia, a member of the board investigating the accident said on Wednesday."

In fact, Scott Hubbard, director of NASA's Ames Research Center (CA), told reporters, "I thought, 'Oh my god, this is more than I expected ... this isn't just a light bounce.'"

The test was conducted last week. Another, using the real wing from Discovery, is scheduled for today (Thursday). Because the Shuttle wing is less-tough than the mockup used in last week's test, many are expecting the damage to the real wing to be even worse.

Since the breakup of Columbia (right) on February 1, that killed all seven aboard, the favorite theory of the cause of the disaster has been damage to the heat-shielding oblative tiles, caused by a strike of a chunk of foam that broke off above the orbiter, from the main fuel tank. The impact speed was estimated at over 500 mph.

Although NASA knew quickly that the foam had hit the shuttle, this type of incident had happened before, and hadn't caused any appreciable damage; the breakup, days later, took NASA by surprise. NASA had apparently never before run a test like last week's.

The Columbia Accident Investigation Board is expected to submit a final report in July.

FMI: www.spaceflight.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

FAA Statement On Starship Flight 7 Accident

SpaceX Required To Conduct Mishap Investigation The FAA released the following statement regarding the loss of the SpaceX Starship vehicle during the launch of Flight Test 7 on Jan>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'Maybe A Record YearÂ’--The True Blue Power Revolution Continues

From 2019 (YouTube Edition): True Blue Power Makes Additional Airline Inroads Ravn Alaska has installed the company’s TB44 (46 amp-hour) Advanced Lithium-ion Batteries on DeH>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (01.17.25)

Aero Linx: The Honourable Company of Air Pilots We are a Livery Company of the City of London; a philanthropic membership organisation which represents and protects the interests a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (01.17.25): Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF)

Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF) A frequency designed for the purpose of carrying out airport advisory practices while operating to or from an airport without an operating >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (01.17.25)

“These fire suppression efforts using aircraft is probably the most effective tool that our firefighters have against fighting these fires to help contain them. When you take>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC