Van Nuys Puts Off Landing Fee Proposal | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sat, Jun 21, 2025

Van Nuys Puts Off Landing Fee Proposal

Airport Commissioners Review Fee Structure and Financial Transparency

In a move that surely disappointed no part of general aviation, the Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Board of Airport Commissioners voted on June 5 to postpone a decision on proposed landing fees at Van Nuys Airport (VNY). The proposed fee, $9.65 per 1,000 pounds, would have ranked among the highest in the country for general aviation.

The delay trails organized pushback from a coalition of aviation advocates, including the California Pilots Association, the National Business Aviation Association, NATA, the Van Nuys Airport Association and others. Their concerns ranged from a lack of financial transparency and unclear methodology to potential FAA compliance issues… the usual red flags when a new fee gets fast-tracked.

Van Nuys, located in the San Fernando Valley, is one of the busiest general aviation airports in the US, with over 330,000 operations in 2024. It's also home to more than 200 aviation businesses. Currently, VNY charges only a fuel flowage fee and relies on subsidies from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to cover airfield costs.

“To maintain a safe and efficient operating environment and ensure that the airport is as self-sustaining as possible, LAWA proposes to establish a landing fee at VNY,” the initial proposal read. “The landing fee will be based on airfield operating and capital costs and the total aircraft landing weight. This is a common industry methodology that is consistent with FAA policy.”

The proposed landing fee would apply to visiting aircraft but would exempt military, government, medical, and home-based aircraft that do not operate Part 135 flights. While LAWA cited new administrative tools as the reason it can now implement a landing fee, critics noted the rollout lacked the kind of detailed budgeting and justification that typically makes such proposals easier to digest.

Eve Lopez, CalPilots Vice President for the LA Region, said that the decision to delay shows “a willingness to return to the table with pilots, operators, and community stakeholders, a critical step toward a fair and data-driven process.”

FMI: www.iflyvny.com

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Capella Aircraft Corp FW1C50

Pilot Reported That He Was Unfamiliar With The Single Seat Amateur-Built Airplane And His Intent Was To Perform High-Speed Taxi Testing Analysis: The pilot reported that he was unf>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Timber Tiger Touts Curtiss Jenny Replicas

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): First Kits to Ship October 2023 Having formerly resurrected the storied shape of the Ryan ST—in effigy, anyway—Montrose, Colorado-based Tim>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.04.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC