NATCA: FAA Supervisor Violated Rules, Endangered Public | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.27.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.28.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.29.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.30.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Sat, Nov 19, 2005

NATCA: FAA Supervisor Violated Rules, Endangered Public

Union Says Sick Employee Forced To Stay On The Job

The National Air Traffic Controllers Association, an organization representing more than 20,000 ATC operators across the country, has accused an FAA supervisor at Gulfport Air Traffic Control Tower in Gulfport, MS of ordering a sick controller to report for work Thursday, even after the employee said he was incapacitated.

NATCA said in a news release the controller involved followed proper procedure in notifying supervisor Ron Burrus to request sick leave due to a sinus infection. However, Burrus told the controller to show up anyway. When the controller arrived at the tower -- still claiming he was incapacitated due to his illness -- NATCA maintains Burrus assigned the employee to work an operational position controlling live air traffic.

"This is an example of a supervisor out of control," said NATCA Southern Regional Vice President Andy Cantwell. "This... supervisor has absolutely placed lives in danger by ordering an incapacitated employee to perform ATC duties."

The employee remained on position for over an hour while NATCA officials attempted to contact Burrus's supervisors. After a flurry of phone calls over the incident, Burrus released the employee on sick leave to visit the doctor -- just as he was legally required to do in the first place, said NATCA representatives.

According to the union, the NATCA/FAA contract contains specific language dealing with this situation: Sick leave shall be approved for an employee who is incapacitated for the performance of his/her duties.

Burrus was unavailable for comment.

"There is no room for interpretation," Cantwell said. "The FAA assumed a huge liability when Burrus assigned the employee to an operational position responsible for the lives of many pilots and passengers."

"There is no excuse for this type of stupidity," Cantwell added.

FMI: www.natca.org

Advertisement

More News

A ‘Crazy’ Tesla Flying Car is Coming

Musk Claims the Tech Could Be Unveiled Within a Couple of Months Elon Musk is once again promising the impossible…this time, in the form of a Tesla that flies. Speaking on T>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.xx.25): NonApproach Control Tower

NonApproach Control Tower Authorizes aircraft to land or takeoff at the airport controlled by the tower or to transit the Class D airspace. The primary function of a nonapproach co>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.01.25)

"It was pretty dang cool to be in a tube-and-fabric bush plane that high, and it was surreal hearing airline pilots over ATC wondering what a Cub was doing up there. The UL is trul>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.01.25)

Aero Linx: Lake Amphibian Club Over the years the cost of a new Skimmer or Lake went from about $16,000 to over $500,000 for many reasons. Sales of Renegades have been very sparse >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: EAA Introduces Angle of Attack Training

From 2024 (YouTube Edition): Clinic Aimed to Promote Safe Aircraft Control The EAA Pilot Proficiency Center hosted an angle of attack (AOA) training clinic during the 2024 Oshkosh >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC