Van Nuys Puts Off Landing Fee Proposal | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Jun 21, 2025

Van Nuys Puts Off Landing Fee Proposal

Airport Commissioners Review Fee Structure and Financial Transparency

In a move that surely disappointed no part of general aviation, the Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Board of Airport Commissioners voted on June 5 to postpone a decision on proposed landing fees at Van Nuys Airport (VNY). The proposed fee, $9.65 per 1,000 pounds, would have ranked among the highest in the country for general aviation.

The delay trails organized pushback from a coalition of aviation advocates, including the California Pilots Association, the National Business Aviation Association, NATA, the Van Nuys Airport Association and others. Their concerns ranged from a lack of financial transparency and unclear methodology to potential FAA compliance issues… the usual red flags when a new fee gets fast-tracked.

Van Nuys, located in the San Fernando Valley, is one of the busiest general aviation airports in the US, with over 330,000 operations in 2024. It's also home to more than 200 aviation businesses. Currently, VNY charges only a fuel flowage fee and relies on subsidies from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to cover airfield costs.

“To maintain a safe and efficient operating environment and ensure that the airport is as self-sustaining as possible, LAWA proposes to establish a landing fee at VNY,” the initial proposal read. “The landing fee will be based on airfield operating and capital costs and the total aircraft landing weight. This is a common industry methodology that is consistent with FAA policy.”

The proposed landing fee would apply to visiting aircraft but would exempt military, government, medical, and home-based aircraft that do not operate Part 135 flights. While LAWA cited new administrative tools as the reason it can now implement a landing fee, critics noted the rollout lacked the kind of detailed budgeting and justification that typically makes such proposals easier to digest.

Eve Lopez, CalPilots Vice President for the LA Region, said that the decision to delay shows “a willingness to return to the table with pilots, operators, and community stakeholders, a critical step toward a fair and data-driven process.”

FMI: www.iflyvny.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.18.25)

“Setting eight speed records this quickly following its August entry into service is a powerful testament to the tremendous capabilities of this aircraft. We are already seei>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.18.25): On-Course Indication

On-Course Indication An indication on an instrument, which provides the pilot a visual means of determining that the aircraft is located on the centerline of a given navigational t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.18.25)

Aero Linx: WW1 Aeroplanes, Inc. WORLD WAR 1 AEROPLANES was founded by Leo Opdycke in 1961 and incorporated as a federally recognized 501 (c) (3) not-for-profit corporation in 1979,>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Shoemaker Ronald R Pazmany PL-2

Pilot Reported That He Purchased The Airplane Earlier That Day Analysis: The pilot reported that he purchased the airplane earlier that day and completed a condition inspection tha>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 11.18.25: Dream Chaser Preps, Joby eTurbine, UAE Flt Test

Also: Abu Dhabi’s 1st Vertiport Network, Anduril-EDGE Partner, Vertical Permit/eVTOL Regs Sierra Space’s Dream Chaser spaceplane has cleared another round of pre-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC