FAA May Be On Thin Legal Ice In Pilot Certificate Revocation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.02.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.03.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.04.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.05.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.06.25

Thu, Jun 30, 2016

FAA May Be On Thin Legal Ice In Pilot Certificate Revocation

UAV Operator Was Subjected To 'Emergency Revocation', But Agency May Have Acted Improperly

Ralph Rebaya is in the midst of fighting an emergency revocation of his private pilot certificate for flying a seven-pound UAV in a way the FAA says was reckless and dangerous. But the person issuing the revocation may not have had the authority to do so.

Forbes reports that Regaya's case is the first of its kind, and is currently being argued before an NTSB administrative law judge.

In its revocation order, the FAA says that Rebaya, who owns a commercial drone company, had been hired by Magellon Entertainment to operate a DJI-S-900 for the purpose of aerial filming. But Rebaya violated several clauses of his section 333 exemption, including filming in close proximity to people and operating in Class C airspace within five nautical miles from Bob Hope Airport (KBUR) There is a laundry list of other complaints, but six months after the filming took place in December, the "administrator" determined that an emergency existed and his PPL should be revoked immediately.

Forbes reports that Rebaya's attorney D. Damon Willens has based the his challenge on whether the FAA's determination that his actions were so egregious that it warranted revoking his pilot certificate for a year, and that the FAA official who issued the revocation order did not have the authority to do so.

According to Willens, the revocation order was issued by the FAA's Deputy Chief Counsel, but that position is not one of those listed in the rule delegating the authority to take such actions.

An attorney contacted by Forbes said that the FAA is generally very diligent about making sure that a person issuing such an order generally has the right to do so.

The case is still unresolved, and Rebaya's pilot certificate is still suspended. Since he needs that to fly his UAV under his Section 333 exemption, he's currently out of business.

FMI: Full Story, Revocation Order

Advertisement

More News

Citation Operators Get Another Flight Data Connection for QA

LinxUs System Adds Capabilities for Data-Driven Operators Textron Aviation announced another option for operators processing their post-flight data, adding interoperability with GE>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.01.25)

Aero Linx: The de Havilland Moth Club Ltd The de Havilland Moth Club evolved from a belief that an association of owners and operators of Moth aeroplanes should be formed to create>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Bellanca 8GCBC

(Pilot) Inadvertently Applied Excessive Braking Action, And The Airplane Nosed Over Analysis: The pilot reported that, while landing at a remote, rough and uneven airstrip in a tai>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.01.25)

“MCADT is committed to rapidly integrating armed first-person view drones into the FMF, enhancing small-unit lethality and providing organic capabilities that warfighters cur>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: High-Speed Match-up - Venom and GE Rebirth A Legend

From 2017 (YouTube Edition): Major Engine Supplier Joins Forces With Small Aircraft Manufacturer… GE recently made an agreement with Venom Aircraft to supply engines for the>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC