FAA May Be On Thin Legal Ice In Pilot Certificate Revocation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.02.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.03.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.04.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.05.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.06.25

Thu, Jun 30, 2016

FAA May Be On Thin Legal Ice In Pilot Certificate Revocation

UAV Operator Was Subjected To 'Emergency Revocation', But Agency May Have Acted Improperly

Ralph Rebaya is in the midst of fighting an emergency revocation of his private pilot certificate for flying a seven-pound UAV in a way the FAA says was reckless and dangerous. But the person issuing the revocation may not have had the authority to do so.

Forbes reports that Regaya's case is the first of its kind, and is currently being argued before an NTSB administrative law judge.

In its revocation order, the FAA says that Rebaya, who owns a commercial drone company, had been hired by Magellon Entertainment to operate a DJI-S-900 for the purpose of aerial filming. But Rebaya violated several clauses of his section 333 exemption, including filming in close proximity to people and operating in Class C airspace within five nautical miles from Bob Hope Airport (KBUR) There is a laundry list of other complaints, but six months after the filming took place in December, the "administrator" determined that an emergency existed and his PPL should be revoked immediately.

Forbes reports that Rebaya's attorney D. Damon Willens has based the his challenge on whether the FAA's determination that his actions were so egregious that it warranted revoking his pilot certificate for a year, and that the FAA official who issued the revocation order did not have the authority to do so.

According to Willens, the revocation order was issued by the FAA's Deputy Chief Counsel, but that position is not one of those listed in the rule delegating the authority to take such actions.

An attorney contacted by Forbes said that the FAA is generally very diligent about making sure that a person issuing such an order generally has the right to do so.

The case is still unresolved, and Rebaya's pilot certificate is still suspended. Since he needs that to fly his UAV under his Section 333 exemption, he's currently out of business.

FMI: Full Story, Revocation Order

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.03.25): No Gyro Approach

No Gyro Approach A radar approach/vector provided in case of a malfunctioning gyro-compass or directional gyro. Instead of providing the pilot with headings to be flown, the contro>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.03.25)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

Airborne 05.30.25: Anti-Helicopter Bill, PW Strike Done, All-Electric Bristell

Also: Duffy Wants $$$, KS Airports, Morningside U’s Aviation School, New Airstrip In ID After 6 were killed in a helicopter crash over the Hudson River, several US Representa>[...]

Airborne 05.29.25: ATC Bonu$, VX4 eVTOL Flies, Starship 9 Test

Also: Hermeus Quarterhorse MK1, Seaplane Rating Guide, Vietjet A330neos, SFO Wacky Weed Bust As the air traffic controller shortage trudges on, the US Department of Transportation >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC