Witnesses Say US Fighter Jet Violated Canadian Airspace | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Aug 30, 2007

Witnesses Say US Fighter Jet Violated Canadian Airspace

Say Low-Flying Fighter Jet Came From South

It may not be most troubling airspace incursion we've seen of late, but it's still a big deal. A US jet reportedly violated Canadian airspace in June, and the Canadian Parliament wants to know why.

Member of Parliament Alex Atamanenko told Defense Minister Peter MacKay to demand a US account on the accusation. "From all indications, an unidentified foreign fighter jet has violated our airspace," Atamanenko said.

"We've done our homework," he aid. "It looks like it was a US fighter jet."

Witnesses reported June 18 a jet coming from the direction of the US flying very low over the Trail airport, then above the town of Trail, according to the Canadian Press.

US officials at Fairchild Air Force Base in Spokane, WA and Whidbey Island air base near Seattle deny any US military aircraft being in the area at that time.

"It is important to note that this area is not barren, open terrain. It is densely populated and the home of a major industrial smelter, Teck Cominco, that is vital to our economy," Atamanenko said.

He said residents of the town of Trail "deserve some answers. We need to know why it was there."

John Crichton, president and CEO of NAV Canada, a private corporation that owns and operates Canada's civil air navigation service, sent a letter to Atamanenko saying radar in that area cannot track aircraft operating below about 6,800 feet.

The Ministry of Transportation said it conducted a "thorough investigation" and confirmed it wasn't a Canadian Forces jet witnesses saw.

FMI: www.navcanada.ca, www.mto.gov.on.ca

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra; the Airplane, the Man, and His Grand DeLand Plan

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Germany’s Best by Way of Florida Established in 1980 by German aerobatic pilot Walter Extra as a means by which to design and develop his own air>[...]

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.27.25)

“Achieving PMA for the S-1200 Series magnetos is another step in expanding our commitment to providing the aviation community with the most trusted and durable ‘firewal>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.27.25): Ultralight Vehicle

Ultralight Vehicle A single-occupant aeronautical vehicle operated for sport or recreational purposes which does not require FAA registration, an airworthiness certificate, or pilo>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.27.25)

Aero Linx: The de Havilland Moth Club Ltd The de Havilland Moth Club evolved from a belief that an association of owners and operators of Moth aeroplanes should be formed to create>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC