NBAA: 'Unsafe to Aviation' Tall Tower Moves from Bayonne to NYC | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jun 04, 2003

NBAA: 'Unsafe to Aviation' Tall Tower Moves from Bayonne to NYC

In late January 2003, NBAA tells us that they provided substantial comments to an FAA Airspace Docket in response to a proposal to construct a 2,000-foot tower in Bayonne, NJ. NBAA, and other concerned parties, argued that the height of the tower coupled with its proposed location in the middle of the busiest terminal airspace in the world would create conditions not conducive to the safe and efficient use of airspace. However, the Metropolitan Television Alliance recently asked the FAA to put the controversial Bayonne, NJ project on hold, because they have completed an agreement with the leaseholder and developer of the proposed 1,776-foot Freedom Tower planned for the former site of the World Trade Center in New York.

The new agreement would return New York broadcasters to the site they occupied before September 11, 2001. New York Governor George Pataki has advocated a construction schedule that would have the cornerstone for Freedom Tower laid in August 2004, and the target date for completion currently is 2008.

In a January 30 letter to the FAA, NBAA President Jack Olcott declared, “NBAA adamantly objects to the construction of the proposed 2,000-foot tower at Bayonne, NJ. The enormous height of the tower, which exceeds the allowable criteria of FAR Part 77, coupled with its proposed location in the middle of the busiest terminal airspace in the world, would unquestionably create conditions not conducive to the safe and efficient use of airspace.”

Association officials are not only concerned about the adverse impact a Bayonne tower would have on visual approaches to Runway 29 at Newark (EWR), but they believe that compromising approaches into EWR will have a “negative domino effect” on operations at Teterboro (TEB).

FMI: www.nbaa.org, jgilley@nbaa.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.24.25: ANN's 30th!, Starship’s V3 Booster Boom, Earhart Records

Also: 1st-Ever Space Crime Was a Fraud, IAE Buys Diamonds, Kennon Bows Out, Perseverance Rover An interesting moment came about this past Sunday as ANN CEO, Jim Campbell, noted tha>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: DeltaHawk Aero Engine Defies Convention

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Deviation from the Historical Mean Racine, Wisconsin-based DeltaHawk is a privately-held manufacturer of reciprocating engines for aircraft and hybrid >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Glasair GlaStar

Smoke Began Entering The Cockpit During The Landing Flare, And Then The Pilot Noticed Flames On The Right Side Of The Airplane Analysis: The pilot reported that about 30 minutes in>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.22.25): Remote Communications Outlet (RCO)

Remote Communications Outlet (RCO) An unmanned communications facility remotely controlled by air traffic personnel. RCOs serve FSSs. Remote Transmitter/Receivers (RTR) serve termi>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC