NBAA: 'Unsafe to Aviation' Tall Tower Moves from Bayonne to NYC | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jun 04, 2003

NBAA: 'Unsafe to Aviation' Tall Tower Moves from Bayonne to NYC

In late January 2003, NBAA tells us that they provided substantial comments to an FAA Airspace Docket in response to a proposal to construct a 2,000-foot tower in Bayonne, NJ. NBAA, and other concerned parties, argued that the height of the tower coupled with its proposed location in the middle of the busiest terminal airspace in the world would create conditions not conducive to the safe and efficient use of airspace. However, the Metropolitan Television Alliance recently asked the FAA to put the controversial Bayonne, NJ project on hold, because they have completed an agreement with the leaseholder and developer of the proposed 1,776-foot Freedom Tower planned for the former site of the World Trade Center in New York.

The new agreement would return New York broadcasters to the site they occupied before September 11, 2001. New York Governor George Pataki has advocated a construction schedule that would have the cornerstone for Freedom Tower laid in August 2004, and the target date for completion currently is 2008.

In a January 30 letter to the FAA, NBAA President Jack Olcott declared, “NBAA adamantly objects to the construction of the proposed 2,000-foot tower at Bayonne, NJ. The enormous height of the tower, which exceeds the allowable criteria of FAR Part 77, coupled with its proposed location in the middle of the busiest terminal airspace in the world, would unquestionably create conditions not conducive to the safe and efficient use of airspace.”

Association officials are not only concerned about the adverse impact a Bayonne tower would have on visual approaches to Runway 29 at Newark (EWR), but they believe that compromising approaches into EWR will have a “negative domino effect” on operations at Teterboro (TEB).

FMI: www.nbaa.org, jgilley@nbaa.org

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: VerdeGo Debuts VH-3 Hybrid-Electric Powerplant

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): New Propulsion Scheme Optimized for AAM Applications Founded in 2017 by Eric Bartsch, Pat Anderson, and Erik Lindbergh (grandson of famed aviation pion>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Grumman American Avn. Corp. AA-5B

During The Initial Climb, The Engine Began To Operate Abnormally And, After About Three Seconds, Experienced A Total Loss Of Power On October 29, 2025, about 1820 Pacific daylight >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.02.25)

Aero Linx: Women in Aviation International Women in Aviation International is the largest nonprofit organization that envisions a world where the sky is open to all, and where avia>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.02.25)

“We’ve paid for the cable line’s repair for the customer and have apologized for the inconvenience this caused them...” Source: Some followup info from an A>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.03.25)

“We have long warned about the devastating effects of pairing optimization. Multiple times over many months, we highlighted how schedule manipulation, unbalanced schedules, a>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC