NASA Safety Panel Worries Over Shuttle Extension Options | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.21.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.22.25

Airborne-FltTraining-10.23.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Tue, Jan 19, 2010

NASA Safety Panel Worries Over Shuttle Extension Options

New Report Also Covers Astronaut Safety And Workforce Transition

The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, or ASAP, has released its 2009 annual report.  The congressionally-mandated group of independent experts was initially established after the Apollo 1 fire.

Following the 2003 space shuttle Columbia accident, Congress directed the ASAP to submit an annual report to Congress and the NASA administrator documenting the panel’s observations and recommendations. This year’s report advises NASA on issues that have potential to directly or indirectly impact the safety of astronauts, NASA personnel, contractors, programs and missions.

"The panel’s report provides a summary of key safety-related issues the agency confronts at this time,” ASAP Chairman Joseph W. Dyer said. "The most important relate to the future of the nation's human spaceflight program. Critical safety issues the panel reviewed include human rating requirements for potential commercial and international entities, extension of the shuttle beyond the current manifest, the workforce transition from the shuttle to the follow-on program, the need for candid public communications about the risks of human spaceflight, and more aggressive use of robots to reduce the risk of human exploration."

Some of the panel's critical safety findings in the 18-page report include:

  • No manufacturer of Commercial Orbital Transportation Services is currently qualified for human-rating requirements, despite some claims and beliefs to the contrary.
  • To abandon the program of record as a baseline for an alternative without demonstrated capability or proven superiority is unwise and probably not cost-effective.
  • Extension of the shuttle program significantly beyond the current manifest would be ill-advised. The panel is concerned about discussions regarding possible extension of shuttle operations.
FMI:  http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oer/asap/index.html

Advertisement

More News

Affordable Flying Expo Announces Industry MOSAIC Town Hall

Scheduled for Friday, November 7th at 1800ET, The MOSAIC Town Hall, Webcast At www.airborne-live.net One of the more intriguing features of the 2025 Affordable Flying Expo, schedul>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Composite-FX Sets Elevates the Personal Helicopter Market

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): The Mosquito Evolves Formerly known as Mosquito, Trenton, Florida-based Composite FX is a designer and manufacturer of personal kit and factory-finishe>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.25.25)

“The Board is pleased to name Lisa as our next CEO after conducting a comprehensive succession planning process and believes this transition will ensure continued success for>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.25.25): Ground Stop (GS)

Ground Stop (GS) The GS is a process that requires aircraft that meet a specific criteria to remain on the ground. The criteria may be airport specific, airspace specific, or equip>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Gallow Daniel A Kitfox Classic IV

The Airplane Stalled Above The Runway Threshold, The Nose Dropped, The Nose Wheel Impacted The Runway, And The Airplane Flipped Over Analysis: The pilot reported that during the fi>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC