NASA Safety Panel Worries Over Shuttle Extension Options | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-01.13.25

Airborne-NextGen-01.14.25

Airborne-Unlimited-01.15.25

Airborne-FltTraining-01.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-01.17.25

Tue, Jan 19, 2010

NASA Safety Panel Worries Over Shuttle Extension Options

New Report Also Covers Astronaut Safety And Workforce Transition

The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, or ASAP, has released its 2009 annual report.  The congressionally-mandated group of independent experts was initially established after the Apollo 1 fire.

Following the 2003 space shuttle Columbia accident, Congress directed the ASAP to submit an annual report to Congress and the NASA administrator documenting the panel’s observations and recommendations. This year’s report advises NASA on issues that have potential to directly or indirectly impact the safety of astronauts, NASA personnel, contractors, programs and missions.

"The panel’s report provides a summary of key safety-related issues the agency confronts at this time,” ASAP Chairman Joseph W. Dyer said. "The most important relate to the future of the nation's human spaceflight program. Critical safety issues the panel reviewed include human rating requirements for potential commercial and international entities, extension of the shuttle beyond the current manifest, the workforce transition from the shuttle to the follow-on program, the need for candid public communications about the risks of human spaceflight, and more aggressive use of robots to reduce the risk of human exploration."

Some of the panel's critical safety findings in the 18-page report include:

  • No manufacturer of Commercial Orbital Transportation Services is currently qualified for human-rating requirements, despite some claims and beliefs to the contrary.
  • To abandon the program of record as a baseline for an alternative without demonstrated capability or proven superiority is unwise and probably not cost-effective.
  • Extension of the shuttle program significantly beyond the current manifest would be ill-advised. The panel is concerned about discussions regarding possible extension of shuttle operations.
FMI:  http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oer/asap/index.html

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (01.16.25)

“The market demand for TBM and Kodiak continues to be resilient, benefitting from the versatility and operational efficiency of these aircraft – which is backed by Dahe>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (01.16.25)

Aero Linx: N3N Owners and Restorers Association The N3N holds a special place in aviation history. The aircraft was both designed and built by the Naval Aircraft Factory, located o>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 01.14.25: VX4 Test, Drone v CL-415 Firefighter, Starship 7

Also: USAF Contractor Suit, Secret Service UAVs, Delta/Joby/Uber, Ferrovial Acquired Vertical Aerospace announced the testing program of its prototype VX4 took another significant >[...]

Airborne 01.13.25: Drone Smacks CL-415, $3.4M Verijet Court Loss, OSH25 Airshow

Also: Starship Threatened, SAOC Replacement, Navy Helos To CA Fires, 12 Planes Of Christmas A firefighting aircraft operating over the Palisades Fire in Los Angeles is grounded and>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Raytheon Aircraft Company C90A

Airplane Began An Un-Commanded Roll Forward And It Subsequently Struck An Unoccupied, Parked Company Raytheon Aircraft Company C90A On December 20, 2024, about 2315 Hawaii-Aleutian>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC