Van’s Aircraft Answers Questions About Part Dimensions | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-07.10.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.11.25

Wed, Sep 18, 2024

Van’s Aircraft Answers Questions About Part Dimensions

Visual Differences Observed In Stiffening Rings And Beads In Formed Aluminum Ribs

Van’s Aircraft says it has been questioned by several builders recently regarding variations in the depth of stiffening rings and beads in formed aluminum ribs.

While understanding the reason for the questions, Van’s says the variations have existed for years. The primary reason for the variances is that the parts were transitioned from T0 to T3 temper. The company also began forming the wing ribs in-house with a large hydraulic press. This allowed for increased production volume and reduced manufacturing time, and from time to time the pressure of the press has varied, resulting in the observed variations in the stiffening ribs and beads.

Van’s states that although the variations can be observed, they do not present any quality or safety issues. However based on concerns expressed by customers, the company will tighten the specifications for the depth and appearance of the stiffening beads to reduce visually observable differences.

The company mentioned by way of historical perspective that in earlier years of aluminum homebuilt aircraft, builders fabricated their own wing ribs. This was done by hand-forming them over wood blocks using a soft hammer bending process, and there were often no stiffening rings or beads in the ribs. Most ribs for homebuilts back then were made from usually 2024-T3 aluminum, including the RV-1 wing ribs. Many of those early homebuilts are still flying today.

The explanation above was provided by Rian Johnson, Chief Engineer, and Richard VanGrunsven, Founder. The full text of the response is available at the link below.

FMI:  www.vansaircraft.com/

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Aviat A1

Airplane Bounced About 3 Ft Then Touched Back Down And Then, With No Brakes Applied, The Airplane Began Veering To The Left Analysis: The pilot entered the airport traffic pattern >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.08.25)

Aero Linx: British Microlight Aircraft Association (BMAA) The primary focus within all aviation activity is SAFETY. In all aspects of our sport SAFETY must come first, whether it b>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Fly Corvair’s Reliable Engine Alternative

From SnF25 (YouTube Edition): William Wynne Builds Practical Aircraft Engines on the Corvair Platform Seeking an affordable alternative to the traditional aircraft engine options, >[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: CiES Fuel-Quantity and e-Throttle Systems Praised

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Bridge of CiES CiES Inc. is a Bend, Oregon-based designer and manufacturer of modular embedded aircraft systems and sensors. The company’s fuel-l>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC