Van’s Aircraft Answers Questions About Part Dimensions | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.09.24

Airborne-NextGen-12.03.24

Airborne-Unlimited-12.04.24

Airborne Flt Training-12.05.24

Airborne-Unlimited-12.06.24

Wed, Sep 18, 2024

Van’s Aircraft Answers Questions About Part Dimensions

Visual Differences Observed In Stiffening Rings And Beads In Formed Aluminum Ribs

Van’s Aircraft says it has been questioned by several builders recently regarding variations in the depth of stiffening rings and beads in formed aluminum ribs.

While understanding the reason for the questions, Van’s says the variations have existed for years. The primary reason for the variances is that the parts were transitioned from T0 to T3 temper. The company also began forming the wing ribs in-house with a large hydraulic press. This allowed for increased production volume and reduced manufacturing time, and from time to time the pressure of the press has varied, resulting in the observed variations in the stiffening ribs and beads.

Van’s states that although the variations can be observed, they do not present any quality or safety issues. However based on concerns expressed by customers, the company will tighten the specifications for the depth and appearance of the stiffening beads to reduce visually observable differences.

The company mentioned by way of historical perspective that in earlier years of aluminum homebuilt aircraft, builders fabricated their own wing ribs. This was done by hand-forming them over wood blocks using a soft hammer bending process, and there were often no stiffening rings or beads in the ribs. Most ribs for homebuilts back then were made from usually 2024-T3 aluminum, including the RV-1 wing ribs. Many of those early homebuilts are still flying today.

The explanation above was provided by Rian Johnson, Chief Engineer, and Richard VanGrunsven, Founder. The full text of the response is available at the link below.

FMI:  www.vansaircraft.com/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.07.24): Ultralight Vehicle

Ultralight Vehicle A single-occupant aeronautical vehicle operated for sport or recreational purposes which does not require FAA registration, an airworthiness certificate, or pilo>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.07.24)

Aero Linx: 1-26 Association The Association’s goal is to foster the helpfulness, the camaraderie, and the opportunity for head-to-head competition that is found in One Design>[...]

Airborne 12.02.24: Electra FG EIS, Prez Osprey Problems, Starship Wants 25

Also: EAA Ray Foundation, MagniX Records, Ruko U11MINI Drone, RCAF PC-21s Elektra Solar recently put the first aircraft from its Elektra Trainer Fixed-Gear (FG) family into service>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.08.24)

“Airline workers know far too well the devastating effects corporate bankruptcies have on the lives of hardworking Americans. Following 9/11, pilots, including myself, made e>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.08.24): Approach Speed

Approach Speed The recommended speed contained in aircraft manuals used by pilots when making an approach to landing. This speed will vary for different segments of an approach as >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC