Van’s Aircraft Answers Questions About Part Dimensions | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Wed, Sep 18, 2024

Van’s Aircraft Answers Questions About Part Dimensions

Visual Differences Observed In Stiffening Rings And Beads In Formed Aluminum Ribs

Van’s Aircraft says it has been questioned by several builders recently regarding variations in the depth of stiffening rings and beads in formed aluminum ribs.

While understanding the reason for the questions, Van’s says the variations have existed for years. The primary reason for the variances is that the parts were transitioned from T0 to T3 temper. The company also began forming the wing ribs in-house with a large hydraulic press. This allowed for increased production volume and reduced manufacturing time, and from time to time the pressure of the press has varied, resulting in the observed variations in the stiffening ribs and beads.

Van’s states that although the variations can be observed, they do not present any quality or safety issues. However based on concerns expressed by customers, the company will tighten the specifications for the depth and appearance of the stiffening beads to reduce visually observable differences.

The company mentioned by way of historical perspective that in earlier years of aluminum homebuilt aircraft, builders fabricated their own wing ribs. This was done by hand-forming them over wood blocks using a soft hammer bending process, and there were often no stiffening rings or beads in the ribs. Most ribs for homebuilts back then were made from usually 2024-T3 aluminum, including the RV-1 wing ribs. Many of those early homebuilts are still flying today.

The explanation above was provided by Rian Johnson, Chief Engineer, and Richard VanGrunsven, Founder. The full text of the response is available at the link below.

FMI:  www.vansaircraft.com/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.25): Circle To Runway (Runway Number)

Circle To Runway (Runway Number) Used by ATC to inform the pilot that he/she must circle to land because the runway in use is other than the runway aligned with the instrument appr>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.05.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: De Havilland DHC-1

At Altitude Of About 250-300 Ft Agl, The Airplane Experienced A Total Loss Of Engine Power On November 6, 2024, at 1600 central standard time, a De Havilland DHC-1, N420TD, was inv>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Boeing Dreamliner -- Historic First Flight Coverage

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Three Hour Flight Was 'Flawless' -- At Least, Until Mother Nature Intervened For anyone who loves the aviation business, this was a VERY good day. Afte>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC